-
Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Solid Investment was a Ponzi that started sometime in 2004 and collapsed in late 2005 or early 2006. A thread was started at the then World Law Direct Forum, which is now named Legal Junkies. The SI thread is now in its third iteration. This thread has lasted this long because budigower/budi/John Doel, has kept it alive by posting updates to the members of SI by claiming that he is after trying to find out who stole their money and find the money. I will not bore you with how this has gone on now for over 12 years with absolutely no results and all the BS that has been told in all these updates.
My only reason for starting this thread here is to announce that budi/budigower/John Doel has told his followers that he is going to file a criminal complaint against me for violating Section 70 of the Rome Statute of the Hague Court of Criminal Justice. The criminal complaint is "Interference with the Administration of Justice."
Only one itsy-bitsy, teenie-weenie problem. Article 5 of the Rome Statute says this and I quote:
"PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW Article 5 Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the
international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute
with respect to the following crimes:
(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression."
Just think, I am being accused of lying that budi is lying in his updates. I didn't realize that by my exposing all of budi's lies and the claim that I was lying he lies was genocide, crimes against humanity, a war crime or crime of aggression. I am such a dastardly guy.
Of course his claim that he is filing this criminal complaints against me has all his followers all giddy and excited because over 500 of them hate my guts for exposing all of budi's lies in his updates over the past 6-7 years.
You can now imagine how mad they really are that I have exposed another one of budi's lies about filing a criminal complaint against me.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
WTF, that whole SI thing is still "playing out"?
Didn't really follow it all that much but remember reading some of the goofiness years ago.
Too funny.
I guess he'll have you up on war crimes pretty soon.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
surfer
WTF, that whole SI thing is still "playing out"?
Didn't really follow it all that much but remember reading some of the goofiness years ago.
Too funny.
I guess he'll have you up on war crimes pretty soon.
Nah, it will be an act of aggression or crimes against humanity; or both. After all I am "aggressively" exposing his lies and it is a crime against humanity that I am exposing his lies to his followers.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Seriously, if you want a belly laugh, you have to go to this thread at Legal Junkies: "In-the-knows" have painted themselves into a corner (3rd thread), and start around page 470 and come forward about 20 pages. It is a laugh a minute and you'll get the flavor of all my adoring fans and how much they admire me. I am overwhelmed with pride they love me so much.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
After giving the 3 Unregistered's posting trying their best to discredit me their five minutes of fame, I decided to expose them and budi for the liars they are. So I posted this:
Let's do a quick recap. I have been told that I am lying when I say that budi is a liar. I have been told that I have provided no evidence that budi has lied. It was then posted to prove this point by one of the Unregistered posters supporting buid's claim that no case number is assigned during arbitration by the Hague Permanent Court of Arbitration, and I lied when I said I had contacted the court was told a case number is always assigned when the arbitration case is filed. Just so there is no confusion, here is the comment posted by Unregistered, and I quote:
"He claims to have contacted the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which reported to him that no case number had been filed by the named arbitration claimants, and, according to Edgington, there should have if the case had been filed.
No arbitration case number is ever assigned at filing because arbitration is not a legal matter, but a disagreement between private parties. Consequently, arbitration decisions cannot be appealed for the same reason.
Arbitration is a matter between private parties who want to settle their differences in private. Thus, in all arbitration matters, a case number is assigned only after a decision has been made and an award has come down, but not before.
So, it appears that Eagle Research, Inc. failed in its investigation because it did not understand how arbitration worked. But, as its president, Lynndel Edgington continued to falsely assert that no arbitration action had ever taken place because he could not find a case number for it.
So I am a lousy researcher, I did not contact the court, and I don't know how arbitration works. So I posted the email I received from Helen Pin, the Clerk of the Permanent Court of Arbitration and she said this, and I quote:
"Dear Mr. Edgington,
Thank you for your interest in the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). When a case is submitted to the PCA for arbitration and meets all the criteria for it to be administered by the PCA, a case number is assigned at the beginning of the process.
With kind regards,
Helen Pin"
So much for I didn't know what I was talking about and I was falsely asserting a case number is filed at the beginning of arbitration. This is budi and Unregistered's LIE #1
Then the story changed to and again I quote:
"In arbitration, no award can ever come down if certain issues should come up, such as criminal activity.
No award can ever come down in this case because the arbitrators discovered that the money in question had been stolen.
As a result, the arbitration claimants have made the decision to file an action in the International Criminal Court in The Hague.
In addition to others, those named in the complaint will be:
1. John D Lier, alias BJH.
2. Lynndel Edgington.
3. The owners and operators of the Internet site containing this forum thread.
The charge will be "Interference With The Administration of Justice," a crime under The Rome Statute.
This criminal complaint will be filed sometime on, or before, 1 April 2018."
Now remember how budi regaled everyone with all the notices that were being sent out to all the guilty parties and the yeoman's job the First Payee had accomplished in this task, and now that the Hague Court was involved the guilty parties would have nowhere to hide and finally action would be taken. None of this happened because there was no filing made with the Permanent Court of Arbitration. But none of this story was a lie according to budi and Unregistered's posting in his defense.
Since that post, it was then stated the section of the Rome Statute myself and others were guilty of was Article 70. And of course the criminal complaint was for "Interference with the Administration of Justice." Now the best part about this lie is that you get two for the price of one. First, Article 70 was posted here for all to read. Nowhere in Article 70 does it have anything to do with what is discussed here in this thread, but has nothing on the real lie told. This lie was typical budi blowing smoke and the Unregistered's defending him doing the same thing. But the BIG LIE, the WHOPPER OF A LIE was there was going to be a filing with the Hague Court of Criminal Justice. This COURT ONLY HANDLES THESE TYPE OF CRIMES, and I quote from Article 5 of the Rome Statute:
""Article 5 Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the
international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:
(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression."
Now do any of you who hate my guts still believe there is going to be a complaint filed against me and others with this court and it would accept the filing? So we have LIE #2 & LIE #3 in one post. So there will be no filing of a criminal complaint with the Hague Court of Criminal Justice just as I said there wouldn't be one filed.
Saadly all the 500+ people who want my hide broke out in their Happy Dance believing budi's lies it was going to happen have found out they were lied to by budi and they were all had again just as I said they were.
But one of the Unregistered's wasn't done. An Unregistered claimed, and again I quote:
"Edgington, in an earlier post on this forum thread, you stated that you performed a search on PASCAS Foundation but could not find anything.
As a result, you said, since you could not find anything, no such entity existed and that Budi was lying when he said his foundation was filed in Australia.
Apparently, you did not search using the correct information."
This was an outright lie. I never said it, but what I did say was "You should ask him to explain why his nonprofit charity Pascas Health Clinics, Pascas Health, or Pascas Foundation Limited (name used to register with PayPal) is not registered with the ACNC (Australian Charities and Not-For-Profits Commission)."
Again the only reason was to discredit me and claim that I am a lousy researcher.
Now if I were still a believer in budi posting nothing but the gospel truth, and I have just proven without any doubt that budi has told 3 major lies, I would be asking myself what other major things has budi been lying about?
Maybe if all of you supporters of budi would start using the same amount of time trying to discredit me and spent it on doing real research on budi, you might not come here trying to discredit me and embarrassing yourselves.
Now what is interesting is that there has not been one post since I made this post in the thread almost 36 hours ago. Usually there are a flurry of posts to try and get a page or two of posts to bury the information. It would only take one post to start a new page in this thread and my post not be seen. I am just glad it has remained visible for as long as it has so more people can read it,
It sure would be fun to be a fly on the wall in budi's Skype group to see how he is dealing with this. One has to wonder if the faithful will not start challenging him instead of just blindly believing every thing he says. One can hope.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EagleOne
This criminal complaint will be filed sometime on, or before, 1 April 2018.
On 1 April 2018. HTH.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Since the faithful who were so excited that they almost wet their collective pants that budi was going to file a criminal complaint against me with thee Hague Court of Criminal Justice to only have all their excitement die on the vine when I proved it was all a lie, are now claiming, and I quote:
"You don't get it.
It isn't just Budi that is going to file criminal charges against you in The Hague. It is going to be as many as five hundred others. The list of complainants on the title page will take up three or more pages.
Also, no one is going to sue you. You, and others, are being charged with criminal activity.
This is an open public forum where anyone can read everything here without having to sign in with a user name and a password.
It is like you have published in every newspaper in the world that Budi is a liar, but you don't come up with any solid evidence of this. If you don't have any information on a subject and Budi talks about it on his forum, he just has to be lying.
And you will be on a list in The Hague with others you don't even know who may have committed crimes you don't know about. But, you just keep posting and rattling on and on.
I don't believe you have any idea of the gravity you are in."
I guess they are now court shopping at the Hague. I am still laughing at their total ignorance and stupidity. They can't file any criminal charges against me. You can't fix stupid but you sure can let them expose it themselves. They have totally lost the plot of the thread and reality. But after believing over 12 years of lies from budi (John Doel) this is what they have become. Sad in one way, but entertaining as all get out.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
at least we have some entertainment since sharley flamed out.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EagleOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scammer
I don't believe you have any idea of the gravity you are in.
Sure he does. His mass x 9.8 m/s2.
Right, Lynn?
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wserra
Sure he does. His mass x 9.8 m/s2.
Right, Lynn?
Absolutely, but sadly they wouldn't get it if I told them. But I'll let them know so let's see if any of them get it.
They still believe that I am going to have criminal charges from the Hague Court of Criminal Justice.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
After I posted why there would not be any criminal complaint filed against me with the Hague Court of Criminal Justice, this was the reply to my post, and I quote:
"Whoops, guess again.
The Rome Statute, and The International Criminal Court, were set up by the United Nations to uncover and prosecute crimes against humanity.
Would you say that calling Budi a liar in public for years constitutes inhuman acts?
And the fact that you have not filed formal charges against Budi to prosecute your accusations so he could properly defend just compounds what you have done and clearly demonstrates your intention to commit ongoing inhuman carnage instead of seeking justice. This pubic forum thread shows this and is clear evidence of your voluntary involvement."
You can't make this stuff up folks. This is utter denial on full display. But wait it gets better. Wait to see in my next post how the narrative has changed as to no case number being assigned with the Hague Permanent Court of Arbitration. This one is even better than this post.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
We now have a third story line in the saga of the supposedly filing of a case for arbitration with the Hague Permanent Arbitration Court. The first story was, and I quote:
""He claims to have contacted the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which reported to him that no case number had been filed by the named arbitration claimants, and, according to Edgington, there should have if the case had been filed.
No arbitration case number is ever assigned at filing because arbitration is not a legal matter, but a disagreement between private parties. Consequently, arbitration decisions cannot be appealed for the same reason.
Arbitration is a matter between private parties who want to settle their differences in private. Thus, in all arbitration matters, a case number is assigned only after a decision has been made and an award has come down, but not before.
So, it appears that Eagle Research, Inc. failed in its investigation because it did not understand how arbitration worked. But, as its president, Lynndel Edgington continued to falsely assert that no arbitration action had ever taken place because he could not find a case number for it."
When I proved that story was a lie, then the story changed to, and again I quote:
"In arbitration, no award can ever come down if certain issues should come up, such as criminal activity.
No award can ever come down in this case because the arbitrators discovered that the money in question had been stolen.
As a result, the arbitration claimants have made the decision to file an action in the International Criminal Court in The Hague.
In addition to others, those named in the complaint will be:
1. John D Lier, alias BJH.
2. Lynndel Edgington.
3. The owners and operators of the Internet site containing this forum thread.
The charge will be "Interference With The Administration of Justice," a crime under The Rome Statute.
This criminal complaint will be filed sometime on, or before, 1 April 2018."
When I proved that story was false, then they came up with this version of the story, and again I quote:
"Arbitration is not like a legal case. It is like two neighbors who are using the same lawn mower and can't agree on who actually owns it. So, they call in a third party to arbitrate the issue for them. That is why arbitration decisions cannot be appealed, because they are not legal, judicial proceedings.
As such, whenever an arbitration issue is filed anywhere, Permanent Court of Arbitration, The American Arbitration Association, or whatever, a case number is assigned FOR IN HOUSE USE ONLY so they can keep track of it amongst themselves.
Then, the arbitration officials conduct an investigation to determine if the persons, and the issues raised by them, are suitable for arbitration.
After they determine that everything is OK, then, and only then, do they notify the arbitration participants as to what the case number is.
Sometimes, the case number is not given out until a final award comes down and the case, and its number, is then posted on a website somewhere.
If, during the investigation, the officials determine there is anything that is not suitable for arbitration, such as issues containing civil or criminal components, the case is rejected for arbitration and, since it is not a legal or judicial proceeding, no notice is issued to the arbitration participants that their case no longer has standing.
This is what happened to the recent Hague pleading. The officials there determined that there were criminal issues (theft) that they had no jurisdiction over. And the Permanent Court of Arbitration said nothing was filed with them because their investigation revealed criminal activity and they rejected the whole thing prior to notifying the arbitration participants of the case number.
Contacting The Hague and asking them if there is a case number on this, they will reply that there is no case because it had been secretly dismissed by them and they were not required to notify anyone that this decision had been made because it is an arbitration not a legal or judicial proceeding.
By the way, electronic signatures were added to the pleading just before it was sent to The Hague via email. Therefore, the original completed pleading now filed with the Short Fingered Donald site would have no signatures on them because none were physically executed."
I just debunked this new story line, so I can't wait to see what version they come up with next, but you can rest assured that they will come up with something.
This is getting to be more fun than a human being should be allowed to have. The mental midgets are out in force and are alive and well on the Legal Junkies forum.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Commenting on a serial ponzi pimps' activities being "crimes against humanity"
Now THAT has got to be one of the funniest things I've read in years.
Wouldn't you just love to know how many remaining Solid Investment victims there really are ???
I'm guessing Budi is posting to himself and even then, only when the medication wears off
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
littleroundman
Commenting on a serial ponzi pimps' activities being "crimes against humanity"
Now THAT has got to be one of the funniest things I've read in years.
Wouldn't you just love to know how many remaining Solid Investment victims there really are ???
I'm guessing Budi is posting to himself and even then, only when the medication wears off
I am just shocked they didn't try to claim my exposing his lies was an act of aggression too. Who knows, that might be next!
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
I just want to know wht's taking them so long. In the time they've made up stories, it all could have been filed already.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Whip
I just want to know wht's taking them so long.
I'm warning you, there's years and years of BudiB/S to wade through, so, you'd be well advised to cancel any social engagements you may have planned for the next year or two.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Since Unregistered was having such a difficult time understanding what crimes against humanity were all about, I thought I would help him out and provide him the definition of what constitutes crimes against humanity. I mean it was the least I could do since they are going to be filing a criminal complaint against me, I thought they should know the list from which they could pick which one best suits what I have done to budi and the over 500 who are filing this complaint. So here's the list they get to choose from:
"•Murder;
•Extermination;
•Enslavement;
•Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
•Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
•Torture;
•Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
•Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender, (...) or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law (...)
•Enforced disappearance of persons;
•The crime of apartheid;
•Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health."
Now if it were me, I would go with the last one, but then they might pick "torture." But knowing them like I do, they won't appreciate my assistance. Ingrates.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
The mental midget Unregistered has struck again. This is his latest post to my providing him the definition of crimes against humanity, and I quote:
"You just don't seem to get it, do you Edgington?
Once a complaint is filed with the International Criminal Court in The Hague, an investigation has to take place which cannot be stopped, unless they do it themselves.
As far as the court dismissing the action, let's see if they do so with something this big and this inhuman.
Meanwhile, if you are charged and they bring the action to court, you will have to make an appearance in The Hague. This could get very expensive for you.
There are no statute of limitations regarding The Rome Statutes, because they deal with crimes against humanity, not with civil or criminal crimes.
You have been calling Budi a liar for years in public. Your posts on this forum thread prove it. What kind of an inhuman person does that and then does not bring official charges to give him a chance to defend himself?
And you have been trying for years to convince SI investors into believing that their money is gone forever and there is no chance of ever getting it back. Even if this is true, which it is not, do you think that dashing the hopes of thousands of people about getting their money back that might save their lives, or that of their families, could be considered inhuman acts? Again, this public forum thread speaks for itself. You've already laid down the evidence. Now, you are trying to get out of it by denying that you did.
If you have not done so already, I strongly suggest you talk to a lawyer and have this person explain the facts of life to you.
You always seem to want to have the last word. So, let's see you try to back peddle your way out of this."
I at first thought he was just ignorant, but now it is clear he is just plain stupid trying to sound educated.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EagleOne
I at first thought he was just ignorant, but now it is clear he is just plain stupid trying to sound educated.
He's not doing bad for someone whose only experience of the law is watching reruns of Perry Mason and LA Law and facing multiple charges of being drunk and disorderly in a public place
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
littleroundman
He's not doing bad for someone whose only experience of the law is watching reruns of Perry Mason and LA Law and facing multiple charges of being drunk and disorderly in a public place
Actually he is from Australia, so what law or attorney shows do they have down under for him to get his expertise?
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
All the same ones the US gets, which is why I said Perry Mason which ran from 1957 to 1966 and LA Law which finished in 1996.
It's not like his understanding of the law is up to date, after all.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Now, don't you worry, Mr. Simpson. I watched Matlock in a bar last night. The sound wasn't on, but I'm pretty sure I got the gist of it.
- Lionel Hutz
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Well, here we are almost 1/2 way through April and you can understand my shock and dismay that budi has made two, count them 2 updates, and not one mention of the over 500 criminal complaints that were to be filed against me with the Hague Court of Criminal Justice by April 1.
Have they no regard for my feelings? Here they got me all excited and pumped up that this was going to happen and then NOTHING? What an utter disappointment. Then on the other hand, if it takes them as long to submit all 500+ criminal complaints as it has the first payee to get everyone's payments, they will get this filed sometime in 2035.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
I thought I would try one more time to prove to the "believer's" that want my hide how there will never, ever be a criminal complaint filed against me, or anyone else for that matter that will be heard by the International Criminal Court (The Hague Court of Criminal Justice). I posted the information straight from the courts website home page. Hopefully they will finally get it, but not holding my breath. It still will be interesting to see if they reply and what they say. It may take them a couple of days to deal with the reality nothing is going to happen.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
I've got to admire your bravery in the face of such a serious situation, Lynn.
It can't be easy going to bed every night knowing at any moment a squad of highly trained commandos might burst in and drag you kicking and screaming to the Hague to face justice
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Actually it is easy when you have two attack and killer cockatiels protecting you. Otherwise I couldn't do it and get any sleep. But I appreciate your concern and adulation.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Just when you thought you had heard it all and budi could not come up with an even more outrageous claim, he manages to top himself. The latest update of utter BS and stupidity says, this, and I quote:
"Budigower » 18 Apr 2018 22:11
Hello People :character-count:
The nomination process for the person who is to complete the delivery of the package has been completed now the controller of this process is to confirm the appointment and set it into play to get the job done.
We should announce that all hospitals in First Payee's home city and now closed until the delivery is confirmed completed.
Though this is the main and most important delivery, there are additional elements to follow, however these will not have the same fanfare and drama attached to them. We will be able to progress from this first package as we have discussed previously.
Cheers Budi"
Sure budi, ALL the hospitals in the FP's hometown will be closed until the package cam be delivered. Gee, it has only taken 3 different couriers to try to deliver a package for more than 2 years, but this new courier is going to get it done. But ALL the hospitals will be closed! Stop it, my sides are hurting from laughing so hard.
As the old saying goes, you can't fix stupid, but you sure can expose it. I guess I should look on the bright side. Now all I have to do is Google what city has all its hospitals closed and we'll know where the FP lives.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Well, the 3 Unregistereds, who are part of my fan club, seems to have disappeared all of a sudden. I can't imagine why.
I can't wait for budi to explain how the FP got ALL the Hospitals closed in her hometown and what they did with the patients, how the employees were being paid while they were shut down, and what they did about all the surgeries that were scheduled that now cannot be performed while the hospitals are closed; and that's just for starters. These pesky details just ruin a good lie.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
so, why were hospitals allegedly getting closed?
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
I cannot believe after all these years SI is still has a blabbery admin still a lyin', or even ONE true believer still believin'.
The part about all hospitals having to be closed lost me, even by ponzi admin standards. WTF reason is that for???
NUK
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nuk_1
I cannot believe after all these years SI is still has a blabbery admin still a lyin', or even ONE true believer still believin'.
The part about all hospitals having to be closed lost me, even by ponzi admin standards. WTF reason is that for???
NUK
There isn't one. Of all the tall tales told over the last 12 years of this thread, this is without a doubt the most inane, idiotic, incredulous, and total BS post of all time. Sadly there are over 500 who believed it.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
I am :shocked: mind you, absolutely totally :shocked: (well not really). Here we are over 30 days from the promise that I was going to have criminal complaints (over 500 of them) filed against me with the ICC, and nothing happened. I was told that by April 1 this would happen. There was nothing I could do to stop the investigation once the criminal complaints were filed. I would be charged for crimes against humanity and would have to go to court to stand trial. What was this crime against humanity that I committed? Why none other than exposing the lies of the admin of the SI Group on a public forum.
There has to be shock, horror and sadness in the SI Group land that it didn't happen. From joy in the streets to utter depression all within a month. My favorite 3 Unregistered posters have gone MIA for the last month, and I'm sure it had to do with no charges being filed and they are depressed and sad. Over 500 of them wanted my head, but instead they got their arse handed to them by budi's lies. Of course instead of being mad and blame budi, they will blame me and be mad at me.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Having 500 imaginary people being angry with you must be an incredible strain, I admire the way you're handling the pressure
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Actually I am disappointed that there are only a little more than 500 out for my head from a self-proclaimed 35,000 members in the group. I am slipping. In Profitable Sunrise it was over 100,000, and in Zeek Rewards it was over 200,000. And those were just the ones who took the time to email and text me.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
just be sure to record your arrest. it will be a you tube sensation
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Alas, after all the big buildup proclaiming that I was going to have over 500 criminal complaints filed against me with the ICC, sadly it seems it was all talk and no walk. No updates from budi with the wonderful news it happened. The faithful must be totally depressed and in anguish it didn't happen.
Now budi has moved on to another major event for the faithful to get all excited about. Here's his latest great news, and I quote:
"Two of the three plaintiffs on a UK high court order signed by Lord Rodger in May 2011, and therefore having standing in the 2007 settlement agreement, have officially lodged a formal judicial complaint through the Court of Appeals in the State of Hessen. This is against Judges Poseck, Aumuller and Graf.
Those in the German federal political scene consider state judges as being fodder, however a federal judge of many years standing is an absolutely another matter. Graf is such a federal judge. For some in the federal bureaucracy, this is filing is akin to 'the world coming crashing down!' We give them time frames and they miss them, so we ramp up the pressure.
This initiative may bring about a judicial Inquiry that is likely to be the start of gross difficulties in amongst those in federal politics in Germany, let alone for the three judges. This is one giant bag of worms for them all."
Now what is really funny is that the president of the Frankfurt Court of Appeals is none other than ....wait for it...........Roman Poseck. Yeppers the one and the same judge. How these two filers would have standing with the 2007 Germany Agreement (which no-one can find a record of) defies logic. Especially since their action was in the UK high court in 2011. Of course that action doesn't have a record of it either, but hey it sure sounds good.
I asked budi to explain all of this for us, as well as name the two, but of course he won't because he can't. He will claim they are afraid for their lives if their names are made public. Guess he doesn't understand that the filing is a public record; that is if one was actually filed. Stay tuned as if the court responds, we will all know if they did and who did it.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Well now that the former claims made by budi (John Doel) amounted to a big fat zerio, just like all his other predictions and comments, we now have a new course of action. Alas no 500+ criminal complaints filed against me with the ICC as claimed, no filing on record against the 3 judges that was supposedly filed with the Frankfurt Court of Appeals, we now have a new direction. For the past 12 years budi has said that it was the German authorities and their courts that was prevented the payments from being made. Now all of a sudden the German authorities and courts are no longer a problem, and I quote:
"Budigower » 07 Jun 2018 17:56
Hello People :character-afropik:
Over many months, the Chancellery has waxed and waned. There have been times when appropriate cooperation was being put into action, only to have some half baked lawyer or wiz kid pontificate some wisdom without having any real knowledge or communication. Then we have the wonderful leader announce yet again - 'I have to think about that!'
Well, the line is being drawn in the sand. We will complete the task at hand without the German's cooperation. This will make their position incredibly uncomfortable. They have been screwing over Portugal, Spain, France, Italy and Greece while being free themselves of any austerity that they have imposed on others. They will now find out how and why it is that Germany has been able to play dictator while living in luxury.
No, we do not need Germany's cooperation to access and deal with our funds.
flash10 » 12 Jun 2018 14:043
HI all,
Still the gag order on the courier process, but let's just say that there has been measurable progress made. And even better, any problems that have come up, have been dealt with. This courier seems to have a fierceness, in a good way, that just won't allow for any stoppage. 3rd time is looking like the charm to stretch the saying. The front line is continuing to be confident with a strong degree of expectation. I have about two weeks to go and a long stretch of 18 months will wind down and leave me with more time to be back in action here. I will have a bit more about Germany in general, as well as our particular court action over the next couple of days.
When one creates a highly complex and secretive procedures with people who are not ingrained in managing minute detail then we have stupid mistakes. It all seems so simple but it is the minute detail that is required in executing the delivery task. Fortunately the key party in the delivery process is a detail focused personality and is on top of 'stupid'. It will be refreshing to have the final phase of the delivery process run smoothly and as a professional would expect.
Budigower » 14 Jun 2018 14:02
Well Folks :violence-rocket: :angry-screaming: :angry-argument:
Absolute rule number 1, do not get Courier trained in skills that James Bond could not achieve pissed off. Courier has got the message across to the Top Dog and he has responded in a ballistic manner. Result - POSITIVE. We do not have a clue about the carnage that is spread around, the stuff ups have and are being fixed up. This is one no nonsense Courier."
Oh and now they are going to file a notice of intent to file a criminal complaint, so I guess I am not out of the woods just yet, and I quote:
"The work in preparation of notice of intent to file with the International Criminal Court is well progressed. This is a couple of steps process, first in consideration is the notice of intent, and this is also an optional step. This is requiring lengthy research and careful construction."
Let me translate that last missive for you: This time we have to come up with a more plausible story about filing criminal complaints than we did last time so those who were upset it didn't happen will believe this time it will be different.
And yes "ALL" the hospitals in the First Payee's hometown are still closed. Man that was hard to type without falling off my chair laughing so hard.
The story has been told that the SI Investor Group has 35,000 members, but only 1,601 members are registered on the blog where budi posts his updates. That's less than 0.05% of all the members, and if that was not bad enough was this gem: Most users ever online was 21 on Thu Jul 20, 2017
Since budi let it be known that he welcomed discussions on his blog, I decided to request permission to post. I was shocked, SHOCKED mind you that he declined my request.
After telling everyone that the payment process no longer needs the German authorities or courts to proceed, comes this new update, and I quote:
"Budigower » 25 Jun 2018 17:39
Hi Guys :character-jason:
Apparently we have created chaos within Germany!
Never before has a formal judicial complaint been filed against a Federal Court Judge and Court of Appeal Judges. Well, it has been done so now.
There is a serious endeavour to undermine the Chancellor and replace her.
They are suffering their own sword. Still their arrogance prevails while they embrace the ends of their careers.
Meanwhile the delivery process slowly moves along its path.
Budigower » 28 Jun 2018 15:01
Hi Guys :character-yoshi:
There is movement in the camp, the saddle bags are full.
There is activity all over the place. Only the Germans seem to be frozen in their self opinionated righteousness."
Since supposedly the German authorities are no longer required, one has to wonder why budi keeps fixating on them. But then old habits are hard to die. Even he has lost the plot of the story now.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
The latest from budi (John Doel) came from his last 2 updates, and he has now dug himself into a hole. Here's the great news, and I quote:
"16 Jul 2018 Yes, the Courier is someone not to mess with and the Courier has got the point across LOUD and CLEAR that the Controller can kiss his butt good bye if what is required is not given so the job can be done. It gets better. Those invisible people directing the Controller have put him on notice that he must get the job done within their time frame or he, the Controller will get chopped from the deal and loose his fee.
Meanwhile we have been marshalling momentum with lawyers who have been extremely difficult to locate. Those who had been connected with Milverton and also Simon. In fact we have progress on all the fronts that we have worked to achieve ways forward for years. It is becoming to be crunch time on multiple fronts."
"18 Jul 2018 Hi Account Holders
Between February 2010 and July 2011 we had verification of payouts to varying degrees involving some 245 transactions. The average confirmed payout was US$91 million and the confirmed payouts amounted to US$22.3 billion. The locations of these recipients involved Malaysia, Denmark, Russia, Greece, Lithuania, Belgium, Panama, Hong Kong, Japan, USA, United Kingdom, Canada, Singapore, Australia, France, Spain, European Union, India, Germany and Mexico. The payout amounts did not mirror the Julius Simulator, they tended to be around 5% to 8% less than that projection.
As you can imagine, most people were very coy about the event, as you will be. Of course there were others who provided no details.
The delivery of the Package will be finalised during the month of August. The last of the hurdles has been lifted. The job will be completed during the month of August. I can tell you that I feel like repeating this a zillion times. The last hurdle is removed.
Now we have a home run and now we need to ensure that First Payee can pay her rent and fill her pantry and we can all prepare for a massive change in our lives. This is awesome. We also have movement on all other fronts that we have been working on, but right now FP needs your support.
Yahoo and about b...... time Budi"
None of what he said about the payments is true, and all the rest is a lie too. It is all he knows how to do.
One would think that with this great news in his update that his blog would have hundreds of views rejoicing over this news. Well, you would think there would be, but alas they couldn't even muster 20 members online at one time to read it.
I can't wait to hear the excuses as to what happened and has delayed the payouts. It is going to be fun to watch all the squirming and twisting budi has to do to try and get himself out of his self-created deadline. Time to get the big bag of popcorn, big drink and your comfy recliner because August is going to be here before we know it and all the fun begins on why nothing is happening.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Well, budi's latest post proves he will be able to keep this lies going for at least another year or two. After boxing himself into a corner that the "package" would be delivered in the month of August, which would start the payment process, now comes this gem; and I quote:
"19 Jul 2018 17:45
Hello Account Holders:
One thing that has become crystal clear from this sojourn is that one’s mind cannot discern truth from false. That is, every time when using the mind to draw a conclusion, the conclusion is flawed – well mostly just damn wrong. It is also a scientific reality that the mind cannot discern truth. Assumptions get us into a bind.
Following the opening of the Package, once received and secured, will be a very thorough and careful reading of the material contained. The material, as we understand it, will require several readings and questionings until all the nuances and technical issues are understood. The size of the funds within this exercise is beyond one’s imagination.
Until the implications of the settlement agreement of 2007, the high court rulings in London, the international laws, the International Monetary Fund regulations, the funds themselves, plus other issues, are understood in relationship to the database and records are addressed then what is to be distributed, how and when cannot be resolved. This is an enormous responsibility.
The initial distribution is to resolve the Settlement Agreement of 2007. So, firstly let us get that payout done.
Then will follow further distributions. These will be governed by what and how much funds can be accessed. Income generated since the 2007 Settlement Agreement will need to be distributed in a progressive and orderly manner. It is most likely that a sizeable volume of the funds will be in the nature of bonds. Bonds are not cash. Until we have a working understanding of what is involved then such detail is not available. It is just not wise to speculate.
Prior distributions, as commented upon yesterday, were the account balances. That is, no fees are deducted, the distributions being full account balances.
Every effort will be made to bring about a speedy distribution. One must appreciate that the enormity of this event requires prudence and clarity of all elements involved with these distributions. From our side, it will be full speed ahead with appropriate prudence and care.
Cheers for now, Budi "
Only in budi's world can the truth not be determined from false. Everything in this update is a lie and total BS. I told you that he lived in a parallel universe not bound my reality, let alone common sense and logic. But hey to the cult members it sounds good.
-
Re: Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleOne
But hey to the cult members it sounds good.
Wouldn't you just love to know how many real "members" there really are ??
I'm guessing if there are 20 members online, 19 of them are Budi himself