-
Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Here is an expirement using Howard Johnson's Magnetically driven motor patent (of which there are 3 different patents) granted in 1979.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=618k46W3kNY
What is your opinion on this expirement and has anyone attempted to replicate it? I've seen more functional expirements like this one that does actually produce a working Howard Johnson Motor.
My expertise is primarily in the field of Electronics, and in my field it is easy to design a amplifier circuit or digital circuit that is unstable and can oscillate, usually this is undesirable, but sometimes is intentional.
Is it possible to design a Machanically Magnetic system that can self oscillate. This system is pure mechanical and magnetic in nature.
Any feedback or questions on this matter is greatly appreciated, thanks...
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Here is yet another expirement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-vYOXm5hrM
The Howard Johnson motor seems to simply be a magnetic motor that is out of balance and forced to oscillate on its own.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
It appears that although the man and the theory are real, the videos are all fakes. Poor old HoJo has become synonymous with a 'free energy' scam.
Quote:
"As of April, 2012, we do not know of anyone who has successfully replicated one of these motors, though many have tried, and many are presently making an attempt. If you are interested in pursuing this task, we invite you to join the HJ_Motor discussion list for that purpose."
Howard Johnson's Magnetic Motor - with links to plans and other resources.
Hank Mills of the Pure Energy Systems News has penned this letter to the scammers - Letter to Hojo (Howard Johnson) Motor Plan Scammers
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
I found the fact they couldn't name who allegedly had the patents that prevented this 'amazing technology' from getting to the public rather dubious. And design patents expire after 20 years so, by their own admission, it's free game now. Anyone CAN produce and sell these if they want.
Not only that, seems all they have to hang their hat on is that someone got patents. Patents can be obtained for anything as long as the claims in the application are true. That doesn't mean the item is at all viable.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hypanor
It is not really free energy. According to the patent documents, these permanent magnets loose about 2% of their magnetism every 18 years. Putting the Magnetic driven motor right up their with nuclear batteries. after about 100 years there should be about a 10% loss in magnetism. So eventually one would have to re-magnetize the magnets again at some point in the future. Thus making this really some sort of magnetic driven battery that is comparable to the same kind of nuclear batteries that NASA uses for deep space exploration probes. Except this isn't using radiactive materials, but instead magnetized materials.
...
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Yes, I understand the principles but its yet to be proven to be achievable.
Most of the worlds Neodymium reserves are in China, which gives them a massive monopoly on the essential product (rare earth magnets) for a successfully built motor. I did read somewhere recently that they were (or were thinking of?) forcing prices up, but also that Japan has discovered deposits which may alleviate that monopoly within the next decade.
Its a bit like solar panels were (and still are to an extent) - the total cost to manufacture (including all supply lines) can outweigh the benefits. Solar's issue was a short useful life span (15 or so years), but that is no longer the case due to technological advances so they became more viable as an urban power source.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
There are a few of problems with solar cells:
1) The sun only shines half of the time, at night the solar cells are worthless.
2) One could charge up a battery during the day with the solar cells and at night live off of the batteries, but for it to be practical and useful most of these batteries would have to be as big as the house, thus costing millions of dollars. And thus costing more than most houses.
3) Solar cells usually don't last long enough to justify their costs. So it is still cheaper and more practicle to use fossil fuels to produce energy than solar cells.
...
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
In an electric driven motor there is only one stator and one rotor, with usually the rotor changing polarities at precise positions in the turn causing both pull and push conditions between the Stator and the Rotor.
The same could be accomplished with Stator and rotor if one could get the Stator to swap polarities as well.
With that said, I think if one could figure out a way of making the Stator rotate its magnetic fields and while the Rotor staid permanent, and both were properly synchronized, and one used multiple groups of these Stators and Rotors like in a 8 cylinder 4 stroke combustion engine. One could possibly get a motor to run only off of permanent magnets and not electrically driven magnets. As long as there were more pushes and pulls and fewer drags on each Rotor/Stator combination.
In the Howard Johnson Motor he has seemed to have found out a way of doing this with only stationary magnets placed at strategic positions with respect to each other. Thus sort of accomplishing the same thing.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
As Whip said, patent expired a long time ago. If nobody can replicate his model from patent than it never worked. I also do not get practicality of magnetised engines except for far space missions or some military missions. They are certainly unpractical for civil use.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Whip
Patents can be obtained for anything as long as the claims in the application are true. That doesn't mean the item is at all viable.
http://s3-ak.buzzfeed.com/static/enh...11349815-5.jpg
Motorized ice cream cone (1999)
Patent #US 5971829 A
Quote:
Abstract
A novelty amusement eating receptacle for supporting, rotating and sculpting a portion of ice cream or similarly malleable food while it is being consumed comprising: a hand-held housing, a cup rotatably supported by the hand-held housing and adapted to receive and contain a portion of ice cream or food product of similar consistency, and a drive mechanism in the hand-held housing for imparting rotation upon the cup and rotationally feeding its contents against a person's outstretched tongue.
Patent US5971829 - Motorized ice cream cone - Google Patents
Maybe it's just me, but, the idea that someone holding a patent somehow means something just doesn't seem so important when Motorized Ice Cream cones can be patented.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r2aZ3llqok
Another simplistic expirement that leads to a more profound version of the Permanent Magnetic motor.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLek_3Hpwus
Here is an example of a V-Gate Magnetic Motor.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKCEceWs-Gc
Demonstration of yet another Magnetic linear motor.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epLOEaoPMFU
Another Demonstration of the Same magnetic linear motor. try to prove this is a fake... or doubt the seriousness of these peoples credentials...
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Just to be clear here Ed. You believe in and support an alternative engery source technology that has little to no scientific support.
The only evidence that you have that it works is from youtube videos. All the websites I found are basically blog posts that once again try to divert you or sell you the plans.
The US military and several other countries would not be held to US patents but even they do not construct or use this motor.
Yet for some reason you won't support tried and true tested technology of solar energy and Wind power?
However, all that being said. Here are the plans for your motor. Feel free to construct one and try it yourself.
Magnetic Motor Instructions
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spector567
Just to be clear here Ed. You believe in and support an alternative engery source technology that has little to no scientific support.
The only evidence that you have that it works is from youtube videos. All the websites I found are basically blog posts that once again try to divert you or sell you the plans.
The US military and several other countries would not be held to US patents but even they do not construct or use this motor.
Yet for some reason you won't support tried and true tested technology of solar energy and Wind power?
However, all that being said. Here are the plans for your motor. Feel free to construct one and try it yourself.
Magnetic Motor Instructions
Spector567, hope you stick around and do some scam busting.
I think someone over on Scam called Poe's Law on Edmund and that is about as spot on as anything I can come up with. I am no scientist, but from what I have read on these motors the big flaw comes when you try to use them to divert the energy to actually power something. At that point the motor expends more energy than it creates, hence no free lunch.
The irony I find with Edmund is that he is very big oil and coal, yet heavily discounts the possibility that those organizations would be the very ones to buy up this technology if it existed and put it on a shelf. He without realizing it proves the point here with an example from the medical community. http://www.realscam.com/f36/type-2-d...ce-1950s-2175/ Which is one obvious "flaw" in the free market. Yet if I read him correctly he would blame environmental nazi fascist socialist commies and big gubment for keeping the magnetic motor from hitting the market. At the same time, he appears to claim the exact opposite from the medical community that would be displayed by big energy.
From my vantage point, the dichotomy in his viewpoints calls in to question what his intent really is.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
I actually claimed that Ed was a poe once before. However, after some investigation I basically determined that he wasn't.
I was able to search up his name as well other sites he has visited. I ran accross several other sources, youtube comments, a short lived blog that he owns. That and the origenal scam post was over 1000 posts long and didn't have as much cut and paste.
As you said there is a dichotomy to his view points but they are very consistent. Blame big goverment and big business can do no wrong.
I'm pretty sure he knows his views are inconsistent but the reality is he is not out to tell the truth. He is out to push a view point.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
I have no beef with alternative sources of energy as long as it is economically viable and reduces damage to the environment (Like how fossile fuels do protect the environment by diverting away from killing plants and animals to only killing barrels of crude oil). However I don't believe in trashing conventional and working sources of energy with lies and propaganda who's only intention is to tax and regulate it out of existence and sending everyone back to the stone age where the average life expectancy was only 12 years of age.
Dr. Howard Johnson has over 18 different patents, with 3 concerning the Linear Magnetic Motor. Every single one of his patents work and are still being used today. All I'm doing on this blog is reviewing others who have cleverly attempted to copy Howard Johnson's ideas.
The Magnetic Linear motor takes advantage of mostly the repulsive nature of common polarity polling magnets, not the attraction between opposing poles. The biggest mistake people make from these motors is that they are perpetual in nature, when they are not. Magnetism is not a permanent state, degaussing of magnetic materials is commonly known, especially when they are getting pounced on by other magnetic fields, but is very slow in nature to degauss. Literally taking many years and decades before a perceptible amount of degaussing can be noticed. In a nuclear fusion reaction it gets its power from the repulsive forces of two protons being forced together with such force as to make stick what should otherwise repulse. Thus magnetic linear motors are attempting the same thing that nuclear fusion reactions are doing, but at the atomic level and not the sub-atomic level.
In a 4 stroke combustion engine only one stroke produces energy and power. The other 3 drag on that power. I'm amazed how anyone could of ever gotten any 4 stroke combustion engine to ever work. However if the timing is spot on and you have enough cylinders (like 4, 6, 8 or more) one can easily achieve continuous series of combustions as long as fuel and oxygen is supplied. However, if the timing is even off by a split hair, the hole thing comes crashing down and stops working.
The same holds true with DC Magnetic motors. There normally is only one cylinder with one Rotor and one stator. Where by the rotor flips between attracting against fixed magnets and opposing fixed magnets as precisely the correct time. In a Linear Magnetic motor the same thing is being done, but without the flow of current; only using fixed magnets that have cleverly been made to either flip the stator or rotor at the right time or having more pushes and pulls than drags on the spin.
The people that failed at making a Magnetic Linear motor never take the precise timing seriously enough, and thus end up with a flop. Only when the timing and correct positioning of the magnetic fields is achieved does the Magnetic Linear unity gain motor work.
These videos are not faked, because none of these people are magicians or professional CGI specialists.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
There is a growing wide scientific support for this, especially in Europe. There is already a 37,000 KW Magnetic Linear over unity gain motor in Germany right now fulling working and generating electricity. It is about the size of a family van and weighs thousands of tons; and is completely powered by magnets and nothing else. There are videos online that show this generator in operation right now. It is being used to power a multi-story building in Germany.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
In one of the last videos it looks like they are using 5 Howard Johnson like linear motors in parallel to achieve smooth clean high RPM's.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Edmund129
There is a growing wide scientific support for this, especially in Europe. There is already a 37,000 KW Magnetic Linear over unity gain motor in Germany right now fulling working and generating electricity. It is about the size of a family van and weighs thousands of tons; and is completely powered by magnets and nothing else. There are videos online that show this generator in operation right now. It is being used to power a multi-story building in Germany.
Ed i'm very very skeptical but i'm not going to dismiss what you are saying without knowing more.
That being said. Youtube video's and blogs are not credable sources and you don't need to be a special effects expert to make a light turn on.
Can you provide an article of what you are talking about above. I'd be interested to see it.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ribshaw
Spector567, hope you stick around and do some scam busting.
I think someone over on Scam called Poe's Law on Edmund and that is about as spot on as anything I can come up with. I am no scientist, but from what I have read on these motors the big flaw comes when you try to use them to divert the energy to actually power something. At that point the motor expends more energy than it creates, hence no free lunch.
The irony I find with Edmund is that he is very big oil and coal, yet heavily discounts the possibility that those organizations would be the very ones to buy up this technology if it existed and put it on a shelf. He without realizing it proves the point here with an example from the medical community.
http://www.realscam.com/f36/type-2-d...ce-1950s-2175/ Which is one obvious "flaw" in the free market. Yet if I read him correctly he would blame environmental nazi fascist socialist commies and big gubment for keeping the magnetic motor from hitting the market. At the same time, he appears to claim the exact opposite from the medical community that would be displayed by big energy.
From my vantage point, the dichotomy in his viewpoints calls in to question what his intent really is.
The reasons for the cure for diabetes getting cured not getting reported is caused by the fact that bariatric surgeons discovered that bypassing the duodenum (the first 12 inches of the small intestine) instantly and permanently cures Type 2 diabetes. The findings were published in the Bariatric journals, but the diabetic specialists Endocrinologists don't spend much time reading Bariatric publications and Bariatric surgeons don't spend much time reading Endocrinologist publications. So the discovery went mostly unnoticed for many decades until a doctor Rubino in Europe rediscovered the 1950's published journals and confirmed the findings in the lab using diabetic rats. The rest is history. But it is still not well published because there is a huge debate in the medical community on how to set the policies.
Out of 25 million diabetics only 200,000 qualify (<1%) in America. however in other countries all diabetics regardless of weight are permitted to have this surgery to cure themselves of Type 2 diabetes.
...
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spector567
Ed i'm very very skeptical but i'm not going to dismiss what you are saying without knowing more.
That being said. Youtube video's and blogs are not credable sources and you don't need to be a special effects expert to make a light turn on.
Can you provide an article of what you are talking about above. I'd be interested to see it.
At least with the videos you can see and hear the words coming from the actual scientists, this is not possible with written documents. Publications can be faked and forged. But video and audio can not be, especially when the actual scientist or expert is being interviewed.
...
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Edmund129
The reasons for the cure for diabetes getting cured not getting reported is caused by the fact that bariatric surgeons discovered that bypassing the duodenum (the first 12 inches of the small intestine) instantly and permanently cures Type 2 diabetes. The findings were published in the Bariatric journals, but the diabetic specialists Endocrinologists don't spend much time reading Bariatric publications and Bariatric surgeons don't spend much time reading Endocrinologist publications. So the discovery went mostly unnoticed for many decades until a doctor Rubino in Europe rediscovered the 1950's published journals and confirmed the findings in the lab using diabetic rats. The rest is history. But it is still not well published because there is a huge debate in the medical community on how to set the policies.
Out of 25 million diabetics only 200,000 qualify (<1%) in America. however in other countries all diabetics regardless of weight are permitted to have this surgery to cure themselves of Type 2 diabetes.
...
Edmund, while what you claim is plausible I would rather see some references to some credible sources. For instance I do not see what the difference would be that only 1% qualify in America, but overseas everyone gets treated. There are 100s of thousands of Americans that travel overseas for medical treatment every year, surely something this remarkable would be somewhere other than U-Tube.
I enjoy learning new things so I did a quick google and came up with this. And a few other articles, what I see is it looks promising, clinical trials, etc. What I am not seeing is an over the top slam dunk. Nor am I seeing that this was buried for 40 years, but again I would like to see any credible links you have.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0305113659.htm
Attachment 4148
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Edmund129
At least with the videos you can see and hear the words coming from the actual scientists, this is not possible with written documents. Publications can be faked and forged. But video and audio can not be, especially when the actual scientist or expert is being interviewed.
...
Ed video is harder to fake but you still have to consider the source. ANYONE can pretend to be a scientists or expert on YouTube. People do it every single day. Also the very nature of YouTube is to produce and edit video's. It won't take much to fake/embellish this sort of thing. most of your YouTube videos show a spinning disk under almost zero friction, spinning very fast. They do not show any meaningful power being produced.
So with respect a story or source from some place reputable is much better than a YouTube video.
Now you said that there is a 37,000Kw motor in Germany. For something this important there must be a news article on it, or information on the organization that constructed it.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ribshaw
Edmund, while what you claim is plausible I would rather see some references to some credible sources. For instance I do not see what the difference would be that only 1% qualify in America, but overseas everyone gets treated. There are 100s of thousands of Americans that travel overseas for medical treatment every year, surely something this remarkable would be somewhere other than U-Tube.
I enjoy learning new things so I did a quick google and came up with this. And a few other articles, what I see is it looks promising, clinical trials, etc. What I am not seeing is an over the top slam dunk. Nor am I seeing that this was buried for 40 years, but again I would like to see any credible links you have.
Diabetes May Be Disorder Of Upper Intestine: Surgery May Correct It
Attachment 4148
Here is a CBS 60 minutes special that talks about the origins of duodenal bypass surgery:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4029652n
it is already being used in America and around the world. America has the strictest rules on using this surgery. This is why <1% of diabetic can get this surgery in America, while most other countries permit it for all Type 2 diabetics. This has no effect on Type 1 diabetes unless Type 1 was caused by Type 2 diabetes, which in some cases is.
HTML Code:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4029652n
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spector567
Ed video is harder to fake but you still have to consider the source. ANYONE can pretend to be a scientists or expert on YouTube. People do it every single day. Also the very nature of YouTube is to produce and edit video's. It won't take much to fake/embellish this sort of thing. most of your YouTube videos show a spinning disk under almost zero friction, spinning very fast. They do not show any meaningful power being produced.
So with respect a story or source from some place reputable is much better than a YouTube video.
Now you said that there is a 37,000Kw motor in Germany. For something this important there must be a news article on it, or information on the organization that constructed it.
And this is coming from someone that believes that a 0.5 degree C rise in 150 years is proof that the world is being destroyed by man made global warming. While the evidence clearly proves that the last 150 years has had the smallest temperature changes in all previously measured historical proxie temperature measurements.
And this from someone that believes polar bears are drowning in the artic circle, even though no one to date has produces a single picture of a drowned polar bear.
If you think these videos are faked, prove it. Explain how they pulled off the fakery.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Edmund129
Here is a CBS 60 minutes special that talks about the origins of duodenal bypass surgery:
The Bypass Effect - 60 Minutes - CBS News
it is already being used in America and around the world. America has the strictest rules on using this surgery. This is why <1% of diabetic can get this surgery in America, while most other countries permit it for all Type 2 diabetics. This has no effect on Type 1 diabetes unless Type 1 was caused by Type 2 diabetes, which in some cases is.
HTML Code:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4029652n
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Edmund129
And this is coming from someone that believes that a 0.5 degree C rise in 150 years is proof that the world is being destroyed by man made global warming. While the evidence clearly proves that the last 150 years has had the smallest temperature changes in all previously measured historical proxie temperature measurements.
And this from someone that believes polar bears are drowning in the artic circle, even though no one to date has produces a single picture of a drowned polar bear.
If you think these videos are faked, prove it. Explain how they pulled off the fakery.
And either of these responses has what, exactly to do with the thread topic?
Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Edmund129
Can you stay on topic?
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Edmund129
And this is coming from someone that believes that a 0.5 degree C rise in 150 years is proof that the world is being destroyed by man made global warming. While the evidence clearly proves that the last 150 years has had the smallest temperature changes in all previously measured historical proxie temperature measurements.
And this from someone that believes polar bears are drowning in the artic circle, even though no one to date has produces a single picture of a drowned polar bear.
If you think these videos are faked, prove it. Explain how they pulled off the fakery.
Ed...... you don't seem to be getting the point. YouTube is not a useful or viable source. People post **** up there every single day making a variety of claims. So You'll have to forgive me if I don't hold a medium primary devoted to funny cat videos along side nationally accredited papers or organizations. You know the saying. "don't believe everything you see on TV." (or youtube in this case)
Also as I said most of your videos' don't show meaningful power production. So while it is very possible that the disc spins at the rate they are talking about. What I am not sure about is amount of power that is being produced. Those are just the questions assuming the videos are 100% true and accurate.
You have not addressed this beyond saying you "heard" something about a megawatt generator in Germany. I'm genuinely interested in that generator.
However, your continued evasion and inability to provide the most basic source information is quickly turning my curiosity into skepticism.
As to the global warming stuff. I believe we have a thread already created for that and you have not addressed my response or other peoples responses yet in that thread.
I'm looking forward to your additional documentation Ed. Than we can talk more about this.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
In terms used by TV Tropes, Edmund129, "You fail marketing forever."
However, I would be more prone to compare you to the Flame Warriors, specifically to Klaxon However, unlike such trolls, you can't seem to manage a spark, much less set a flame war going.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ribshaw
Spector567, hope you stick around and do some scam busting.
I think someone over on Scam called Poe's Law on Edmund and that is about as spot on as anything I can come up with. I am no scientist, but from what I have read on these motors the big flaw comes when you try to use them to divert the energy to actually power something. At that point the motor expends more energy than it creates, hence no free lunch.
The irony I find with Edmund is that he is very big oil and coal, yet heavily discounts the possibility that those organizations would be the very ones to buy up this technology if it existed and put it on a shelf. He without realizing it proves the point here with an example from the medical community.
http://www.realscam.com/f36/type-2-d...ce-1950s-2175/ Which is one obvious "flaw" in the free market. Yet if I read him correctly he would blame environmental nazi fascist socialist commies and big gubment for keeping the magnetic motor from hitting the market. At the same time, he appears to claim the exact opposite from the medical community that would be displayed by big energy.
From my vantage point, the dichotomy in his viewpoints calls in to question what his intent really is.
Oil Companys and other corporations don't have the power to prevent anyone from using a patent, even if the oil company's buy it up and own the patents. Only the Government has the power to prevent someone from using a patent without the patent holders permission or paying royalties. Even though the patent holder has to pay the legal fees, it is still only the government that has the power to prevent, deprive, arrest or destroy anyone's attempt to use a patented Magnetic Linear Motor.
The Government steals 98% of all gross profits from the selling of all energy and fuel products. The Energy and fuel companys only get to keep 2% of those gross profits, Oil and Energy companys have no more interest in crude oil and energy production because of the paper thin 2% profit margins, they are the first ones that want to see fossil fuel sources to get replaced by something else. It is the Government that will loose Trillions of dollars per year in energy and fuel sales, the oil company's will only loose billions. So it is only World Governments that are interested is keeping fossil fuels, nuclear fuels, hydro-electric power, etc., because they are easily taxed. How are they going to tax a Magnetic Linear Motor built in someone's home or factory?
Governments are the power hungry power grabbing power greedy organizations that prevent the use of competitive energy sources, not oil companys or energy companys. Governments attract egotistical power hungery people and repel the rest.
None of this will put the oil companys out of business though, because Crude oil is used to make over 10 million different products above and beyond just fuel and energy products. It is also used to make synthetic fibers, synthetic rubber, fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, paints, lacquers, waxes, dyes, plastics, etc., ...
...
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Edmund, I am too tried to quote that nonsense as everyone knows it is pure gibberish. The average Joe in America is supposed to have a lobbyist in their elected officials. Instead only BIG (INSERT INDUSTRY HERE) has lobbyists. While we have less corrupt governments than a lot of places, much improvement is needed. Like ZERO PRIVATE MONEY going to elected officials. At that point, once the whores leave, I will be much more willing to entertain a serious discussion about Gubmit.
But your AM radio, internet blog view of Gubmit, is not only ill informed it is destructive to our very way of life. Industry, economy, all the social functions are a little more complex than your lemonade stand version of Capitalism where industry can do no wrong and Gubmit is out to get you.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Edmund129
Here is a CBS 60 minutes special that talks about the origins of duodenal bypass surgery:
The Bypass Effect - 60 Minutes - CBS News
it is already being used in America and around the world. America has the strictest rules on using this surgery. This is why <1% of diabetic can get this surgery in America, while most other countries permit it for all Type 2 diabetics. This has no effect on Type 1 diabetes unless Type 1 was caused by Type 2 diabetes, which in some cases is.
Spoken like somebody who knows nothing at all about Type II diabetes, other than what he has read on conspiracy websites and seen on populist "news" programs.
That is NOT why less than 1% of American type II diabetics can have access to this type of drastic surgery.
The WHOLE story and citations, Edmund, or it's all boolsheet.
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
littleroundman
Spoken like somebody who knows nothing at all about Type II diabetes, other than what he has read on conspiracy websites and seen on populist "news" programs.
That is NOT why less than 1% of American type II diabetics can have access to this type of drastic surgery.
The WHOLE story and citations, Edmund, or it's all boolsheet.
I know more about Type 2 diabetes than you realize. I was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes 16 years ago and have been attending Endocrinologist Dietician education classes for most of those 16 years. I first notice my first symptoms of Type 2 Diabetes (Insulin Resistance) when I was a teenager back in the early 1970's when I only weighed in at 140 pounds and 6' 1" tall. Based on my height and weight I should of weighed no less than 160 pounds, so I was literally 20 pounds underweight. This is when I first noticed my first symptoms of type 2 diabetes with diabetic rashes on my feet and shins, suffered from bad chronic dandruff, psoriasis of the skin, and chronic athletes foot fungus that would never clear up; And massive head aches when I over exerted myself, massively heavy breathing and chest pains after vigorous exercise and extremely soar after working out later in the evening and in the mornings.
I was cured of Type 2 diabetes a little over one year ago on April 23rd,2012 when I got an operation called the duodenal Switch. The surgery instantly cured me of my Type 2 diabetes within 5 days after the surgery. I was off all of my diabetic medications, blood pressure medications, cholesterol medications and heart medications before I even left the hospital. I was also instantly cured of my chronic psoriasis of the skin; which includes my dandruff and athletes foot fungus problems and patches of dry skin on parts of my body where the sun normally doesn't shine. Before the operation I weighed in at 380 pounds, two weeks after the operation I lost 56 pounds, and one year later I lost 152 pounds. One year later I weighed in at 228 pounds and still losing about 2 pounds per week. The amazing thing was, I was cured of my Type 2 diabetes even before I lost my first pound.
Since the surgery heavy workouts don't leave me winded or soar later or in the morning. My body and muscles feel find later in the evening and in the mornings.
According to Bariatric surgeon Dr. Thompson of Barkers Bariatrics in Dallas, Texas, they have clearly proven in both human and lab animal studies that if they bypass the duodenum (the first 12 inches of the small intestine, which only makes up about 5% of the entire small intestine) that Type 2 diabetes and all of its symptoms are instantly cured. And if they restore the duodenum back, that the Type 2 diabetes will instantly return like it had been before. They have tried bypassing and even removing other sections of the small intestine, the stomach and even the large intestine, and none of which have any effect on the Type 2 diabetes. Only when the duodenum is removed does the Type 2 diabetes completely disappear. Baratric surgeons have clearly proven that Type 2 diabetes is strictly a disease of the duodenum and nothing else is causing the Type 2 diabetes.
Massive weight gain does not really cause Type 2 diabetes, but simply only makes the disease worse than it otherwise would be. Not all Type 2 diabetics gain weight. Only about 33% do. The country with the largest percentage of diabetics is India with 9% of the population having diabetes. 50% to 67% of Indians are vegetarians and they are some of the thinnest people in the world. China comes in second, when was the last time you saw an overweight Chinese?
Only 8.25% of Americans have Diabetes, which means there are about 25 million Americans with diabetes. Only 200,000 daibetics qualify for duodenal bypass surgery, those are the official numbers. that means less than 1% of all American diabetics qualify for this type of surgery. In spite of the fact, that the medical community knows the surgery works on all diabetics regardless of weight.
So as you can clearly see most diabetics are of completely normal weight or even flat out thin. In a type 2 diabetics lower weight can make the symptoms so small and mild they may not even realize they have Type 2 diabetes until their first heart attack or stroke, or bout with cancer.
...
-
Re: Magnetic drive Motor or Nuclear Driven Motor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ribshaw
Edmund, I am too tried to quote that nonsense as everyone knows it is pure gibberish. The average Joe in America is supposed to have a lobbyist in their elected officials. Instead only BIG (INSERT INDUSTRY HERE) has lobbyists. While we have less corrupt governments than a lot of places, much improvement is needed. Like ZERO PRIVATE MONEY going to elected officials. At that point, once the whores leave, I will be much more willing to entertain a serious discussion about Gubmit.
But your AM radio, internet blog view of Gubmit, is not only ill informed it is destructive to our very way of life. Industry, economy, all the social functions are a little more complex than your lemonade stand version of Capitalism where industry can do no wrong and Gubmit is out to get you.
There used to be an oil lobby decades ago, but they were eradicated through corrupt political upheavals in the 1970's. Do you really think if the oil company's had good lobbyists that they would be paying 98% of their gross profits in Federal and State taxes?
Do you really think if the oil companies had really good lobbyists in Washington that the President could sick the EPA on them and shut down all of their oil riggs in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska? If the oil Company's had any kind of lobbyists in Washington that they would have to put up with the Mass fraud of "Man Made Global Warming" Carbon taxes and Cap-N-Trade laws and regulations?
....