Thread: Is My Advertising Pays / The Advert Platform A Scam or Ponzi?

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Why is it that whenever you watch a British cop show, they ALWAYS get the bad guys, yet, when this bunch of crooks give the police the names, dates, times and location of their next criminal activity in advance, there's nary a copper to be seen



What's happened to the once legendary British Bobby ???

Have he / she turned into mere civil servants in blue ???

Hahaha! Quite so, LRM.

And "higher level support" and "UK Tec" - that'll be the ladies on the sofa with the laptops, then?

is the dead digadz still kicking maps ass?

Originally Posted by nerd

God damn it these assholes are so ******* stupid

Attachment 10645

Even if a "JOB" was the problem these folks are always talking about leaving it for a Ponzi or Pyramid scheme. How many "leaders" are on their umpteenth real deal opportunity? First they become a customer of the scam often making a large purchase themselves. Then their new business job involves endless recruiting of others just as inept at spotting a scam. Not always, but these are often the people least able to afford the time and money lost in their little con games.

Here's their hero, even he doesn't have the lauded passive income, one shitty hotel conference room to the next lying to suckers.

The companies Simon promoted or endorsed:


PressWiseMarketing - 1998
WinStarDirect -1999
Amazing2ndIncome.com - 2000
Leads4 income - 2000
Wizpro - 2002
Juiceboosted - 2004
Host4Income - before 2006
Prosperity Automated System - 2006
MyVideoTalk - 2006
Monopolizer - 2006
MoreThanTraffic - 2006/2007
Extreme2ndIncome - 2007
Passport to Wealth - 2008
Myinternet business - 2009
YourNetBiz - 2009
How to Market Expert - 2009
My Shopping Genie - 2010
Howtomarketexperts.com - 2010
200kincome - 2011
Free Blog Factory - 2011
Banners Broker - 2011-12
Empower - 2012
My Advertising Pays - 2012 TO CURRENT
Uvioo - 2013
Pluginprofits - 2013

Unknown years:
Traffic Explosion Formula
GDI
5PAYS
NastyDollars.com
Coastal
ASPIRITUS
888
Easy30kMonthly


Timeline:


1998
The Office of Fair Trading accuses Simon of 'preying on the vulnerable'.

1999
The Office of Fair Trading took out an Injunction against him.

TARA TALKS: SIMON STEPSYS - BEWARE!

Has he promised you the earth and given you manure instead! Has he taken your money and then refused to answer your emails/ texts or phone calls?

Then please contact Trading Standards on:
0845 4040506 if you live in the UK.

The office of Fair Trading have stated that they will look into him again if multiple complaints are filed.

Don't let him get away with it!

Padlock your wallets, people.

MAP in a Box is here:





Put one of these MAP pretendy cheques under your pillow at night and in the morning you'll......................








wake up with £39.95 less than when you bought the silly bloody thing

Originally Posted by Whip

is the dead digadz still kicking maps ass?

BJ kicking mapass only wagging one little finger. Imagine when he is cured and they start the world tour.

Engagement On Desktop, in April, 2015
estimated visits 1.6M

Digadz.com Traffic Statistics by SimilarWeb

Originally Posted by ribshaw

Here's their hero.
The companies Simon promoted or endorsed:

Excellent find "ribshaw"

Personally, I think this photo of Simon Stepsys says it all.

SS pic TT May 15.jpg

(Photo credit: Tara Talks blog site: TARA TALKS: SIMON STEPSYS - BEWARE!. Check out Tara's blog, lots of info about all sorts of things there!)

Originally Posted by path2prosperity

Excellent find "ribshaw"

Thanks P2P but all the credit on that goes to TARA TALKS she made me the man I am today.

Maps 447 May 15.jpg

So.....how is this going to affect Simon Stepsys and his partner Jules /Julie Davies? Both have MAPS accounts and live in the same household. He has 1200 credit packs, she has posted on her FB page that she has 1111 credit packs.

Which account will be terminated, Frankie, can you let everyone know? After all, you've got to set a good example for all the other Mappers, haven't you?

Same goes for Ray Smith, the "Team Mapeeter"....if his wife is now an "Elite" member, she must have at least 100 packs. Presumably they live under the same roof?

I kinda think this rule will have a sudden revision when they realise who it affects. That, or they will just ignore it in special cases!

Maps 448 May 15.jpg

Originally Posted by Della Cate

He has 1200 credit packs, she has posted on her FB page that she has 1111 credit packs.

Why doesn't tightwad Simon Stepsys just pay for Julies remaining Ponzi points to get her to the magical 1200 surely he can afford it?

I'm sure they would be moving into a £6,000,000 mansion in no time at all.

As has been said before, smart players watch for the signs.

Accounts terminated here......no payments on weekends there.....the odd system outage......

All mean one thing - less payouts = extending the life of the ponzi

Originally Posted by Della Cate

Maps 447 May 15.jpg

So.....how is this going to affect Simon Stepsys and his partner Jules /Julie Davies? Both have MAPS accounts and live in the same household. He has 1200 credit packs, she has posted on her FB page that she has 1111 credit packs.

Which account will be terminated, Frankie, can you let everyone know? After all, you've got to set a good example for all the other Mappers, haven't you?

Same goes for Ray Smith, the "Team Mapeeter"....if his wife is now an "Elite" member, she must have at least 100 packs. Presumably they live under the same roof?

I kinda think this rule will have a sudden revision when they realise who it affects. That, or they will just ignore it in special cases!

Maps 448 May 15.jpg

you know the booth's have seperate accounts.

This rule is for the masses, not the "important" hierarchy of MAP's. Do you really think that Mike Deese is going to terminate Simon Stepsys because he and his wife each have accounts? This is selective enforcement and just an excuse to start banning accounts so they don't have to pay them when funds get low.

yep. you mean two people with separate real businesses under the same roof can't 'advertise' on the juggernaut that will allegedly take over google known as maps? LMAO!

seems self defeating for an alleged real 'advertising' business. surely the affiliates are going to start asking why 'their' company isn't taking money that's handed to them right? who cares where 'advertising' money comes from that is needed to pay the affiliates when their credit packs mature? after all.............it is all from 'advertising' right?

Originally Posted by Whip

yep. you mean two people with separate real businesses under the same roof can't 'advertise' on the juggernaut that will allegedly take over google known as maps? LMAO!

seems self defeating for an alleged real 'advertising' business. surely the affiliates are going to start asking why 'their' company isn't taking money that's handed to them right? who cares where 'advertising' money comes from that is needed to pay the affiliates when their credit packs mature? after all.............it is all from 'advertising' right?

Fiddlesticks, I am having a problem making sense of this rule. The only business reason I could concoct is not having one person with two accounts clicking the same ads. To what end does that meet when advertisers know that people are just clicking their 10 ads so they can get rich. Surely a family that clicks together stays together, at least until the Ponzi implodes. Wouldn't having a couple clicking the same ads and discussing them be better for the ad buyers?

The profit share per pack is the same with one account and 1200 credit packs as two accounts with 600, however seen in that light two accounts would represent twenty clicks. This would mean the same profit share would be paid for double the clicks, what advertiser wouldn't want that?

LRM and Eagle - I think you are both right.

I don't think for one minute that Stepsys and Davies will have an account terminated. I think that they are setting up something that they don't necessarily have to use now......but it might come in handy in future.

"No, sorry, you, your wife and your eldest daughter all have accounts, the rule is one per household, so we are terminating two of them right now! Tough luck if you lose $78,000 each, rules is rules...."

Which begs the question how the Booths will manage. Do Tony, Lynne and whichever daughter appears to be under the same roof ALL have accounts?

It should be remembered Septic Simon and Co are serial criminals and are old hands at the scammin' biz.

They're smart enough to use different ISPs, wireless hotspots or to login to their account/s via Tor or VPN.

It's the "little guy" who is going to get caught out by the sudden change in policing accounts.

Oh......here we go.....Simon has a rival in the "posting pictures of ALL MY MONEY" stakes.....but don't share it as Danny does not want to look like a show off....

Maps 449 May 15.jpg

And Danny, this isn't hard evidence of anything. We have no way of knowing where the money comes from....or even if it is real. Get a grip, man!

(In the comments below, I see that Simon has asked that in any pictures of money, his name should be tagged. Anyone know why he says that? )

Originally Posted by ribshaw

Fiddlesticks, I am having a problem making sense of this rule. The only business reason I could concoct is not having one person with two accounts clicking the same ads. To what end does that meet when advertisers know that people are just clicking their 10 ads so they can get rich. Surely a family that clicks together stays together, at least until the Ponzi implodes. Wouldn't having a couple clicking the same ads and discussing them be better for the ad buyers?

The profit share per pack is the same with one account and 1200 credit packs as two accounts with 600, however seen in that light two accounts would represent twenty clicks. This would mean the same profit share would be paid for double the clicks, what advertiser wouldn't want that?

When I used to do PTC accounts I would set up an account above myself in my partners name and take my own referral commission via that account. There is no need to give it to your recruiter / referrer. I assume that is what they are trying to stop. There are also ways and means of getting around them finding out you are at the same address. So, if anyone is reading this and are thinking of joining - keep you 10% to yourself and minimise your own losses! Sod your sponsor!

Originally Posted by Dandygal

[/COLOR]

When I used to do PTC accounts I would set up an account above myself in my partners name and take my own referral commission via that account. There is no need to give it to your recruiter / referrer. I assume that is what they are trying to stop. There are also ways and means of getting around them finding out you are at the same address. So, if anyone is reading this and are thinking of joining - keep you 10% to yourself and minimise your own losses! Sod your sponsor!

Welcome Dandy

Thanks that makes perfect sense, it always seems to come back to the commission on referrals.

Along those lines I suppose you could fund an account, collect your own commission, then cash out when the packs mature for a quick double dip.

Since you have been in PTC before, what is your opinion on MAPS being the next google versus a money game?

I was going to give you a screenshot from Our Tone's blog, where he gives a "report" into the recent German events (actually in Austria, but hey ho, Tone isn't too clear how many countries there are on the planet, so keeping Germany and Austria clear may be beyond him).

However, in the interest of speed and economy, and because Tone doesn't actually give much in the way of information, I will give you a summary in the form of this picture:-

Kittens May 15.jpg

Here's the link if you want to read the full thing:-

Top Advertising UK | my advertising pays

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Why is it that whenever you watch a British cop show, they ALWAYS get the bad guys, yet, when this bunch of crooks give the police the names, dates, times and location of their next criminal activity in advance, there's nary a copper to be seen



What's happened to the once legendary British Bobby ???

Have he / she turned into mere civil servants in blue ???

Originally Posted by Della Cate

Oh......here we go.....Simon has a rival in the "posting pictures of ALL MY MONEY" stakes.....but don't share it as Danny does not want to look like a show off....

Maps 449 May 15.jpg

And Danny, this isn't hard evidence of anything. We have no way of knowing where the money comes from....or even if it is real. Get a grip, man!

(In the comments below, I see that Simon has asked that in any pictures of money, his name should be tagged. Anyone know why he says that? )

because he's an uber-douche

If the Mapper Muppets want to get in touch with the MAPs "Team", or find out information, here is how to do it:-

TB blog 20 May 15 1.jpg TB blog 20 May 15 2.jpg TB blog 20 May 15 3.jpg

So....no press releases to the Times, Telegraph and Reuters then? Just go and look on a Facebook page?

I know FB is fun, lots of cute kitten pics and shots of your friends on holiday; but I wouldn't rate it as the place that a serious company used to get out information. Whatever sort of organisation does that?

Oh, hang on, wait a minute....

Anyone else seen this?....



Screen Shot 2015-05-20 at 10.57.43.jpg
Screen Shot 2015-05-20 at 10.57.56.jpg
Screen Shot 2015-05-20 at 10.58.05.jpg