Nothing to behold here, I am just a bona fide armchair lawyer who has been engaging in JBP's unsolicited defense within the parameters of the US legal code. Mainly that law enforcement can't bring someone to custody based on speculation and internet hearsay. My stand has been clear: you need hard proof that a crime has been committed or you (LE) have to focus your attention on "real" acts of crime.
For all the best intentions you may have on this forum, you and your lackeys maybe hurting a program that also had only the best intentions for its members, and if this programme is able to deliver what it promised, all the unsubstantiated warnings and nonfactual claims of scam posted here will only demonstrate to the authorities that forums like this are the ones that should be shut down because they prove to be as misleading as the online money programs they purport to be giving free "advice" against.
Really "LRM", you're walking on a fine line between libel-defamation and responsible discussion. That begs the question; isn't that the main reason why you and 99% of the members hide your real names behind a computer??? There is no question in my mind that had I used my real name to make this counter-argument in favor of JBP, my real name and identity would have been tarnished forever on the web and I would have been titled a "scammer", a "shill", a promoter, you name it. Meantime, all of you would have been cowardly hiding behind your computers. As a matter of fact, and in all fairness, the most courageous members appear to be Lynn Edgington and Patrick Hernan, and this I say regardless of my personal experience with them. At least they speak to the public what they believe in, and in the process, put their real names on the line.
Bookmarks