Many resellers of EZ Wealth Solution have had multi $1,000 days, many times within the 4 year history of the company. If it's achievable for many members to be able to accomplish this income by doing simple online tasks, then it's an achievable income.
I myself have earned large incomes from many online businesses by doing simple online tasks: posting ads and sending followup emails, basically just copying & pasting and clicking. These are skills most online users use every day.
HAS ANYONE EVER LOOKED UP WHETHER OR NOT SCAM DISCUSSION SITES ARE POTENTIALLY SCAMS WITHIN THEMSELVES?
This is currently being sent to lawmakers in all 50 states:
### Advertisers are not to be targeted individually on scam-bust genre of sites because they are not the owner of the business. A business owner is ultimately responsible for any and all advertising issues of every member of the company. If scam sites are harassing an advertiser by name with no proof of wrongdoing, the scam site owner is liable to be named in a class action suit from all advertisers of that business if it causes a potential loss of income for all advertisers of that business, if business is NOT a scam and publicly implied as a scam without proof, and if that information is read and believed by the general public. If income is determined to be achievable by many advertisers of a business by doing simple repetitive tasks, then that income is considered a valid potential earning among all advertisers. Potential income is determined by median income of all advertisers from the previous year, removing all zero dollar earners from the calculations, and averaging all earnings of all members who earned income. The lost potential income is then calculated for the amount of time that the erroneous scam post was in existence, for example, if lost income is calculated at an average of $25,000 per year from the total of earning advertisers, and divided by for example a 4 month scam post thread, all plaintiffs in the class action suit, including all zero-dollar earners compensated for potential loss of motivation, may each receive approximately $8,333 in compensation from the scam site owner, if there are 1,000 advertisers in a company at the time of the action, the total damages incurred to the owner of the scam site would be $8,333,000. These figures are an example, actual monetary awards may be higher or lower depending upon average median income per group and amount of time of scam post. ###
KEEP IN MIND: Posters at scam sites have no specialized training or education that makes them more reliable than your neighbor or grandma.
* Is there a SPECIFIC list of rules and consequences that posters need to MANDATORILY READ and CHECK A BOX TO AGREE before being allowed to start posting?
* Are those rules and consequences enforced by administration in EVERY post?
* Does the site actually allow equal viewpoints, without preconceived ideas that the business or owner is wrong from the start?
* Does administration look at every post and immediately clean up violations, or have RELIABLE no-slack assistants to do so?
* Do the posters stay on topic about the business or owner being discussed, without off-topic banter?
* Do the posters understand the compensation plan of the business well enough that they can explain it to other people from memory, without needing to read it from a site or paper?
* Have any of the posters in threads been IN the business being discussed? If none of the posters have been IN a featured business, how can they offer valid negative commentary?
* If posters are disparaging a business they ARE or WERE in, did they put in a focused promotional effort for a prolonged amount of time, at least 20 provable hours of promotional time, and can they show proof of their efforts to other people, such as hundreds of actual ads posted at ad sites or received CC copies of safemail ads sent?
* Do individual posters gather their own information or just repeat negative opinions from other posters without doing their own in-depth study?
* Do scam posters from USA understand the different aspects of non-ponzi pyramids and MLMs, and ratings and other aspects of the Better Business Bureau, and rules of the U.S. Postal Service about mailing sales materials, plus the one-call rule of individual cold-calling (one call allowed, if answer is no, then caller must never call again)?
* There are no set rules governing scam discussion sites, there are, however, rules about potential loss of income resulting from these sites, if targeted individuals can prove lost income during the time frame of the postings, the site owner is liable to be held responsible for all discussions pertaining to that individual's loss of income and expenses incurred therein, especially if there is no Mandatory Posting Agreement with which every poster needs to be in agreement prior to start of posting.
Bookmarks