Thread: Traffic monsoon. Better than MAPS with trusted admin Charles Scoville

Meanwhile, Adrian Hibbert, former eager Monsooner, is trying to distance himself from TM....

TM 294 Sept 16.jpg

Isn't it the case that the Zeek receiver has come after him as a net winner to pay back his gains? Does he think that he will avoid a repeat performance with TM if he decries it now?

It hasn't stopped him moving into the next little venture (or two, or three):-

TM 295 Sept 16.jpg

Powerlead. Exitus. Futurenet. And some cryptocurrency thingy as well? Our Ade loves to try new things, obviously!

While not surprised at this news as it was clear Charles was not getting the financial support he needed to pay his attorney, the bad news now we have to listen to six more weeks of nonsensical posts about how TM is not a Ponzi BS.

If Charles thinks he can change lawyers at the last moment again and get it rescheduled, he is going to be in for a very rude surprise. I think I am going to buy stock in clothes-pins. People will be rushing to buy them in droves to put on their noses to stop the stench from Charles' posts.

Seems Lloyd Dotson (aka) I M Bigg is going for it again !


I Am Bigg - Lloyd Dotson - Author, Speaker, Business Consultant

https://www.facebook.com/iambigglloy...c_location=ufi

Originally Posted by EagleOne

While not surprised at this news as it was clear Charles was not getting the financial support he needed to pay his attorney, the bad news now we have to listen to six more weeks of nonsensical posts about how TM is not a Ponzi BS.

If Charles thinks he can change lawyers at the last moment again and get it rescheduled, he is going to be in for a very rude surprise. I think I am going to buy stock in clothes-pins. People will be rushing to buy them in droves to put on their noses to stop the stench from Charles' posts.

Great this gives me more time to stock up on popcorn.

Originally Posted by Della Cate

Now which attorney would that be, Chazza? The old one or the new one you've just hired?

Attachment 15748

Whoever he/she is, they really should be telling you to wind your neck in, and stop posting nonsense!

Neither the SEC or Paypal seem confused about what was happening.

5. In reality, Traffic Monsoon’s advertising business is a illusion designed to obscure the fact that it is offering and selling a security in a pure Ponzi scheme. Over 99% of Traffic Monsoon’s revenue comes from the sale of AdPacks. The company has virtually no other revenue from any other source. All payments to investors are made out of these funds.

46. In early January 2016, PayPal contacted Scoville and notified him that it was considering limiting his account. PayPal’s compliance department had noted that Traffic Monsoon’s account had some earmarks of a Ponzi scheme, such as very rapid growth and almost no chargebacks or refund requests.


https://www.sec.gov/litigation/compl.../comp23604.pdf


Probably have to start a whole new scam and roll people over to get this debt paid off.

dear scott and allison my members are screwed.JPG

55. As of July 21, 2016, the TM account at PayPal had a balance of $23,316,843.


ponzimath.jpg

Originally Posted by ianh

Seems Lloyd Dotson (aka) I M Bigg is going for it again !

I Am Bigg - Lloyd Dotson - Author, Speaker, Business Consultant

https://www.facebook.com/iambigglloy...c_location=ufi

You know what's screamingly funny ??

For all the huffing and puffing, deep and meaningful messages and big noting, all the guy's doing is pimping ponzis, for goodness sake.

Talk about someone aspiring to be a big fish in a big pond.

"Hey, mum, look at me, I B/Sed another 20 people into losing their money to a ponzi promoter"

woo-BLOODY-hoo

Originally Posted by Della Cate

Goodness me. William and all the other apologists (like our Shazza) are going to have to chenge their flight tickets.

What a nuisance!

perhaps chucky actually believes how bad Sinus wants to come to defend him and is delaying until after his 'mourning'. lmao!

scoville scammer1m.JPG


1) agreed. you are intentionally 'confused'

2) always funny

scoville scammer1g.JPG

3) then why the delay? clearly there is something so blatantly obvious that they would state that and should be marching in there immediately to bitch slap the SEC. Why allow yourself to be labeled the scammer you are if the SEC is wrong? I mean, you wouldn't be lying yet again would you? lol. tool

Charles_Scoville.jpg
Charles_Scoville_001.jpg

Lord....Charles Scamville truly lives in a dream world.
A pansy, Turdbird that just keeps clucking away...

He just figured out he needed a securities specialist?
He just threw a % of rather tiny amount of $ raised away on Ed Wall?
He knew last week yet didnt bother to tell the deranged TMers who made plans to go 2 Utah?
etc

Funny in a sad way.....

Originally Posted by Della Cate

Somehow, I get the impression that Sharon and Immy aren't that popular....

Attachment 15738

And here's Jose's rebuttal. Also, can I claim a prize for spotting the first mention of "we were only affiliates"?

Attachment 15739

Joseph - BRAVO. More of you lot need to come to your senses and smell a giant Ponzi-toting ratbag when you sense one

José - Get off the internet and STAY OFF, you oily, gammon-faced, unscrupulous ****-spangle

Ad the ponzi pimp calls it
adthepimpcallstmdone.jpg

Charles inherited his thinking process from mama Shirley...

Shirley_Scoville.jpg

Originally Posted by Bestbud

Charles_Scoville.jpg
Charles_Scoville_001.jpg

Now that's gotta peg every BS Meter around!

Hopefully his new attorney will tell him to SHUT UP! To think we have six-more weeks of this utter BS from him alone will drive some of his members to drink.

What I find interesting is that last year Charles kept talking about how his attorney had approved AHP as being a legal program and therefore TM was legal too. So since the attorney who reviewed AHP and said it was legal, why isn't this same attorney representing him now? If his attorney was able to state AHP was legal, why wouldn't this same attorney be able to represent Charles in TM since TM is based on AHP? These questions are for the members, for we know the answers. We knew Charles was lying then, just as he is lying now.

Trafficmonsoon.jpg

Traffic Monsoon Receivership - Client Home

Originally Posted by Whip

scoville scammer1m.JPG


1) agreed. you are intentionally 'confused'

2) always funny

scoville scammer1g.JPG

3) then why the delay? clearly there is something so blatantly obvious that they would state that and should be marching in there immediately to bitch slap the SEC. Why allow yourself to be labeled the scammer you are if the SEC is wrong? I mean, you wouldn't be lying yet again would you? lol. tool

I'm an avid student of trying to demonstrate from what Charles has told the SEC that he doesn't (and never did have) enough money to pay the TM liabilities.
BUT, I don't think that this #2 you keep quoting really shows that very well? It's open to interpretation. My interpretation of what Charles meant by that answer is that when the frozen ad packs come out of pending they would then have resumed earning, as if the "gap" in which they were frozen had never existed. In other words he would have said for example that if a given ad pack had been live for 30 days... then the freeze hit... then when the paypal money became available that pended pack would be resumed with 30 more days (approx.) to run - whatever it took to reach $55 payout in the normal way.

So... the alternative- best I can find in what he gave the SEC is that he said there were nearly 6 million ad packs pended, and so the average remaining liability on each ad pack is half of $55 = $27.50 ... giving an estimated total remaining liability of $192 MILLION on those ad packs.

Originally Posted by Bestbud

Sounds like Polygamy (plural marriage) to me...

Momma Scoville sounds like a typical feral who has 4 kids by 5 fathers and lives on welfare...

Originally Posted by EagleOne

the bad news now we have to listen to six more weeks of nonsensical posts about how TM is not a Ponzi BS.

6 more weeks of entertainment...WOOHHOOO!!!!

Originally Posted by stephenjgray

I'm an avid student of trying to demonstrate from what Charles has told the SEC that he doesn't (and never did have) enough money to pay the TM liabilities.
BUT, I don't think that this #2 you keep quoting really shows that very well? It's open to interpretation. My interpretation of what Charles meant by that answer is that when the frozen ad packs come out of pending they would then have resumed earning, as if the "gap" in which they were frozen had never existed. In other words he would have said for example that if a given ad pack had been live for 30 days... then the freeze hit... then when the paypal money became available that pended pack would be resumed with 30 more days (approx.) to run - whatever it took to reach $55 payout in the normal way.

So... the alternative- best I can find in what he gave the SEC is that he said there were nearly 6 million ad packs pended, and so the average remaining liability on each ad pack is half of $55 = $27.50 ... giving an estimated total remaining liability of $192 MILLION on those ad packs.

And that would have been fine had he also suspended them having to click during that time for those packs. (I mean, they were getting paid back their own money plus some to look at hamburgers they were buying. lol) He didn't, He owes them, and that is why that very question was asked.

I haven't seen Attorney Kevin Thompson weigh in for awhile...

Kevin_Thompson.jpg

Receivership filing details Scoville's non-cooperation (Traffic Monsoon)

Originally Posted by Whip

And that would have been fine had he also suspended them having to click during that time for those packs. (I mean, they were getting paid back their own money plus some to look at hamburgers they were buying. lol) He didn't, He owes them, and that is why that very question was asked.

Hmmm, interesting you say that! I agree I never saw any communication from him (or his pimp/leaders) that members with frozen packs should stop clicking. Nor did I see any communication that they should continue clicking either. In the discussions I read on the various FB pages about it, most people were saying "no point continuing to click"- so the impression I got is that most people with pending packs didn't bother to continue clicking! Also, it seemed "obvious" to me that the implication of Charles' "frozen, pending" was that those ad-packs were completely inactivated, and so it seemed obvious to me that there would be no need or point to continued clicking. In reality I expect some continued clicking and some didn't. Also, of course, a lot of those with pending packs soon bought at least 1 new active pack (as encouraged to do) so then they would have to continue clicking anyway (but no way to know what % of members in this boat).

if members knew those packs wouldn't have earned them money while they were sitting there, they would have freaked and is exactly why he never told them. The fraud reports would have gone through the roof.

Originally Posted by stephenjgray

My interpretation of what Charles meant by that answer is that when the frozen ad packs come out of pending they would then have resumed earning, as if the "gap" in which they were frozen had never existed.

I think Charles has going from playing word games (paying everyone's earnings) to outright lying (pay everyone's account balance and then some).

Originally Posted by stephenjgray

I'm an avid student of trying to demonstrate from what Charles has told the SEC that he doesn't (and never did have) enough money to pay the TM liabilities.

There were 15,000,000 packs sold, or obtained via imaginary compounding.

As Stacy told us $200,000,000 would have allowed for the purchase of only 4,000,000 packs.

11,000,000 packs were created out of thin air, a HUGE problem for Chucko. Perhaps the judge will let him settle them with doughnut holes?



Revenue from purchases of AdPacks, including rollovers $738.5 mm

Less cash taken in of $207M
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Scoville owes $531.5M using his own model without playing any what went where games.



These two documents give an approximation of how much cash may be lying around.

55. As of July 21, 2016, the TM account at PayPal had a balance of $23,316,843.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/compl.../comp23604.pdf
dear scott and allison my members are screwed.JPG