Quote Originally Posted by Whip View Post
Problem with their headline is they never proved what exactly was defamatory so how could there have been a decision, much less in their favor?
They manipulated the court, they filled a bogus case against Anonymous , for some reason in Florida, not mentioning what they find defamatory or who and making sure nobody real who can be reached is named as a defendant.
After they manipulated court through public announcement in local Florida newspaper that there is a CASE against Anonymous John Doe,
claiming by that the defendant was served.
Their plan was that nobody ever respond to it and court will grant them a judgement by default.