http://imageshack.com/a/img834/4517/ytyjw.jpg
WINNER !!
Before proceeding, be sure to read and understand the Legal Notice found here: http://stoptheamwaytoolscam.files.wo.../agreed3-1.pdf
Here’s the same agreement in text form, which will allow others who use other languages to interpret it:
CAUSE NO. 199-03090-2010
AMWAY CORP., A Virginia Corporation
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, An individual residing in Texas
Defendant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
199th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
It is, accordingly, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
AGREED CONSENT DECREE AND FINAL JUDGMENT
On this day, Plaintiff, Amway Corp., and Defendant, Scott E. Johnson, appeared by and through their respective attorneys of record and announced to the Court that Plaintiff and Defendant have reached an agreement to enter a permanent injunction, Consent Decree and a Final Judgment in the above-referenced civil action. Plaintiff and Defendant waive their right to a jury trial, and waive their right to appeal this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment. Plaintiff and Defendant agree and consent to the entry of the following permanent injunction and Final Judgment in the above-referenced civil action.
1. Plaintiff shall take nothing on Plaintiffs monetary and damage claims against Defendant, (including Plaintiffs claim for attorneys’ fees, court costs and pre-judgment interest); however, Plaintiff shall be awarded the permanent injunction described herein;
2. Defendant shall take nothing on Defendant’s claims against Plaintiff as contained in Defendant’s Counterclaim;
3. Plaintiff and Defendant shall take nothing against each other on any claim that was or could have been asserted in the above-referenced civil action through the date of this Final Judgment, except for the specific Judgment awards described herein and the permanent injunction against Defendant as contained in this Final Judgment as all other such claims and forms of relief are dismissed with prejudice;
4. Each party shall bear its own court costs and attorneys fees;
5. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from initiating or having any Communications-with any and all persons known or reasonably believed to be an Amway Independent Business Owner or IBO for any reason whatsoever except that Johnson may communicate with IBOs regarding non-Amway related matters. For purposes of this Section 5, “Communications” shall mean any and all types of direct or indirect verbal, written or electronic communication or messages, including, but not limited to, letters, written documents, fliers, hand-bills, e-mail, text messages, telecopy, fax, messages or communications sent through the Amway personal retail website or other IBO websites, Facebook posts, LinkedIn messaging, or any and all other communications or messages sent through any other type of social media;
6. Nothing contained in this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment shall prevent Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2,” and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, from maintaining a blog or website, publishing a book, testifying in response to a lawful subpoena served in accordance with law, giving a radio interview, nor from posting messages on a social media website, page or message board unless Johnson reasonably knows or believes that the website, page or message board is owned or operated by Amway or an IBO, giving a television interview, or engaging in other communications that are directed to the public at large; however, Sections 7-11 of this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment shall be complied with;
7. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from using profane or obscene language or images relative to or directed toward Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO, or making any physical threats toward Amway or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO;
8. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from blaming or associating Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO with any death, illness, or accident;
9. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from misappropriating the name, identity or likeness of Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO for any purpose, or otherwise violating the rights of privacy and publicity of any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO; however, this paragraph shall not preclude Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them from using the name “Amway” in the text or title of a blog, website, book, article, or any other public communication providing such use does not infringe Amway’s trade mark rights;
10. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from stating or creating the impression that they are in any way currently affiliated with, currently associated with, or authorized to ever speak on behalf of or represents Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO;
11. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from encouraging, aiding or abetting the conduct of any other person that would violate any of the restraints contained in paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, above;
12. This Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment finally disposes of all claims and all parties;
13. This Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment is not appealable. All parties have consented and approved the entry of this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment as to form and substance;
14. Execution shall issue for this Judgment;
15. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment and the permanent injunction contained herein;
16. The bond previously filed with the clerk and executed by Plaintiff in the sum of $ 1,000.00 payable to Defendant shall be released to Plaintiff, and the Clerk is instructed to deliver a check in the amount of $1,000.00 made payable to “Amway Corp.” to Plaintiffs attorney of record; and,
17. Nothing in this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment shall require Defendant to modify or delete anything he has previously posted to a website, blog, or message board, unless Defendant owns the website,blog, or message board in question.
SIGNED AND ENTERED on this 9 day of December, 2011.
ROBERT T. DRY, JR. DISTRICT JUDGE 199th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE
BY: Wm. Charles Bundren, Esq. Attorney-in-Charge
STATE BAR NO. 03343200
WM. CHARLES BUNDREN & ASSOCIATES LAW GROUP PLLC
2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300.
Frisco, TX 75034
Telephone: 972.624.5338
Fax: 972.624.5340
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
BY: Robert J. Wood, Jr., Esq.
STATE BAR No. 00788712
FELL & WOOD, LLP
3021 E. Renner RD., Suite 140 Richardson, TX 75082
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
What does this agreement mean in plain English? Items 1-4 deal mainly with the fact Amway didn’t get paid one penny for suing me, including paying their own attorney costs. As the judge decided my counterclaim would have to go arbitration, I also didn’t get anything from Amway for my counterclaim. It is well known the Amway arbitration process is unconscionable and illusory for a variety of reasons, so I obviously won’t be pursuing that path for my counterclaim.
Items 12-17 handle other administrative matters, which leaves items 5-11, the real “meat” of the agreement. Note the items keep me focused on the problem that needs to be solved, the Amway Tool Scam, and ensure I keep a positive reputation, so they are ALL favorable to me and the cause of shutting down the Amway Tool Scam.
Also note this does not give me permission to do things that are clearly illegal, such as rob an LCK’s house, etc. However, I WILL cause much more damage to Amway financially than they could dream in their worst nightmare. Amway will rue the day they tried to sue me and utterly FAILED in their inept attempt to silence me, ESPECIALLY since this agreement protects me against another idiotic SLAPP lawsuit. All I have to do is “color inside the lines,” and Amway has legally and permanently agreed they cannot sue me.
The main thing I gave up was communicating with IBOs, which I was finding to be both time consuming and having limited results, which frees up my time to be more productive in getting the Amway Tool Scam shut down. The following is a summary of these items, and note all of these items are directed towards me and those who associate with me regarding Amway and the Amway Tool Scam, referred to as “we” below:
5 – We cannot communicate with IBOs or those reasonably believed to be IBOs, unless the communication is not associated with Amway. Note the listed communications are defined and confined as directed to Amway IBO owned and/or operated media, and item 6 further reinforces this as well. Note there is almost unlimited ability in communicating with non-IBOs who are associated with Amway, such as Amway employees, lawyers, etc., UNLESS it is a public forum owned/operated by Amway or an IBO, which is also described in item 6. By omission, we can communicate with non-IBOs in private without restrictions, including 6-11 below. Note however, any private communications that are not consistent with 6-11 must remain private.
6 – Within the limits listed in 7-11, we CAN communicate publicly, as long as the communications are directed towards the general public. This means we can communicate publicly ABOUT Amway and the Amway Tool Scam, including IBOs, as long as the communications are directed to the public at large AND the public forum is not owned/operated by Amway or an IBO. By the way, this entire public blog IS directed towards the public at large. In other words, if an IBO posts on this blog, they can be responded to, without violating the agreement.
7 – No cussing, obscene language or images, or physical threats against Amway or those associated with their tool scam.
8 – Can’t blame or associate Amway and those related to Amway to any death, illness, or accident. However, there is a LOT of ground not covered by these restrictions, such as these actual examples:
Amway being accused of “roughing up”and threatening former employees when they sided with the legal authorities in Canada,
An IBO raping a 12 year old girl while selling door to door in San Diego,
Rich DeVos’ son in law, who was fired from running the Orlando Magic because he made a fool of himself by calling the franchise basketball player (Dwight Howard) while drunk and was reportedly sleeping around on his wife Cheri, Rich DeVos’ daughter.
9 – Can’t misappropriate the name, identity, or likeness, or violate the rights of privacy and publicity of Amway or those associated with Amway. However, this leaves a LOT of flexibility, as most of the people of public interest are also publicly visible, which severely limits their rights of privacy and publicity, AND the internet has provided a wealth of information regarding these dirtbags.
10 – Can’t state or create the impression we represent or are affiliated or are associated with Amway and their scam. This is probably the easiest one: Why would we want to be connected in any way to such an immoral and unethical operation in the first place?
11 – We can’t have others violate 5-10 in our place.
If you want to contact me directly, email stoptheamwaytoolscam@yahoo.com, you can even talk with me without giving up your phone number, just propose a time to call a free conference number (dial *67 before dialing, only your normal long distance charge, if any, to southern California where the conference call is based, applies) at (760) 569-6000, access code 975016. I am in the Central time zone, keep that in mind when setting up a call.
But the bottom line is you don't have a clue regarding the differences between a Ponzi scheme and an illegal pyramid. LOL
Come on, Lynn the Loser. You have all of this time to snip out my repetitive message that people aren't reading, or else they would ask semi-intelligent questions, but you can't answer the simple question I asked you on the first page of this thread? LOL
But the bottom line is you don't have a clue regarding the differences between a Ponzi scheme and an illegal pyramid. LOL
Lynn the Loser - You STILL haven't answered the question on page 1 of this thread, even though you have plenty of time to snip my messages! LOL
At least the other stupid cowards on this forum post messages, you're such a bigger coward you won't even do THAT! LOL
But the bottom line is you don't have a clue regarding the differences between a Ponzi scheme and an illegal pyramid. LOL
need to update this page since twinktwink thinks he can bury the real info about him.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...psae86f3eb.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...psa73db44d.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps88e985e6.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps11ac989a.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...psbb8842f3.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps4a1cd97e.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...psdfb1aa7a.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps51a7cb4c.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps2acf35d2.jpg
Before proceeding, be sure to read and understand the Legal Notice found here: http://stoptheamwaytoolscam.files.wo.../agreed3-1.pdf
Here’s the same agreement in text form, which will allow others who use other languages to interpret it:
CAUSE NO. 199-03090-2010
AMWAY CORP., A Virginia Corporation
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, An individual residing in Texas
Defendant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
199th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
It is, accordingly, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
AGREED CONSENT DECREE AND FINAL JUDGMENT
On this day, Plaintiff, Amway Corp., and Defendant, Scott E. Johnson, appeared by and through their respective attorneys of record and announced to the Court that Plaintiff and Defendant have reached an agreement to enter a permanent injunction, Consent Decree and a Final Judgment in the above-referenced civil action. Plaintiff and Defendant waive their right to a jury trial, and waive their right to appeal this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment. Plaintiff and Defendant agree and consent to the entry of the following permanent injunction and Final Judgment in the above-referenced civil action.
1. Plaintiff shall take nothing on Plaintiffs monetary and damage claims against Defendant, (including Plaintiffs claim for attorneys’ fees, court costs and pre-judgment interest); however, Plaintiff shall be awarded the permanent injunction described herein;
2. Defendant shall take nothing on Defendant’s claims against Plaintiff as contained in Defendant’s Counterclaim;
3. Plaintiff and Defendant shall take nothing against each other on any claim that was or could have been asserted in the above-referenced civil action through the date of this Final Judgment, except for the specific Judgment awards described herein and the permanent injunction against Defendant as contained in this Final Judgment as all other such claims and forms of relief are dismissed with prejudice;
4. Each party shall bear its own court costs and attorneys fees;
5. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from initiating or having any Communications-with any and all persons known or reasonably believed to be an Amway Independent Business Owner or IBO for any reason whatsoever except that Johnson may communicate with IBOs regarding non-Amway related matters. For purposes of this Section 5, “Communications” shall mean any and all types of direct or indirect verbal, written or electronic communication or messages, including, but not limited to, letters, written documents, fliers, hand-bills, e-mail, text messages, telecopy, fax, messages or communications sent through the Amway personal retail website or other IBO websites, Facebook posts, LinkedIn messaging, or any and all other communications or messages sent through any other type of social media;
6. Nothing contained in this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment shall prevent Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2,” and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, from maintaining a blog or website, publishing a book, testifying in response to a lawful subpoena served in accordance with law, giving a radio interview, nor from posting messages on a social media website, page or message board unless Johnson reasonably knows or believes that the website, page or message board is owned or operated by Amway or an IBO, giving a television interview, or engaging in other communications that are directed to the public at large; however, Sections 7-11 of this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment shall be complied with;
7. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from using profane or obscene language or images relative to or directed toward Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO, or making any physical threats toward Amway or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO;
8. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from blaming or associating Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO with any death, illness, or accident;
9. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from misappropriating the name, identity or likeness of Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO for any purpose, or otherwise violating the rights of privacy and publicity of any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO; however, this paragraph shall not preclude Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them from using the name “Amway” in the text or title of a blog, website, book, article, or any other public communication providing such use does not infringe Amway’s trade mark rights;
10. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from stating or creating the impression that they are in any way currently affiliated with, currently associated with, or authorized to ever speak on behalf of or represents Amway, or any Amway owner, officer, employee, agent, attorney or IBO;
11. Defendant, SCOTT E. JOHNSON, a/k/a “TEX” and “TEX2″, and Defendant’s respective officers, managers, trustees, agents, servants, employees, confederates and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from encouraging, aiding or abetting the conduct of any other person that would violate any of the restraints contained in paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, above;
12. This Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment finally disposes of all claims and all parties;
13. This Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment is not appealable. All parties have consented and approved the entry of this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment as to form and substance;
14. Execution shall issue for this Judgment;
15. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment and the permanent injunction contained herein;
16. The bond previously filed with the clerk and executed by Plaintiff in the sum of $ 1,000.00 payable to Defendant shall be released to Plaintiff, and the Clerk is instructed to deliver a check in the amount of $1,000.00 made payable to “Amway Corp.” to Plaintiffs attorney of record; and,
17. Nothing in this Agreed Consent Decree and Final Judgment shall require Defendant to modify or delete anything he has previously posted to a website, blog, or message board, unless Defendant owns the website,blog, or message board in question.
SIGNED AND ENTERED on this 9 day of December, 2011.
ROBERT T. DRY, JR. DISTRICT JUDGE 199th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE
BY: Wm. Charles Bundren, Esq. Attorney-in-Charge
STATE BAR NO. 03343200
WM. CHARLES BUNDREN & ASSOCIATES LAW GROUP PLLC
2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300.
Frisco, TX 75034
Telephone: 972.624.5338
Fax: 972.624.5340
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
BY: Robert J. Wood, Jr., Esq.
STATE BAR No. 00788712
FELL & WOOD, LLP
3021 E. Renner RD., Suite 140 Richardson, TX 75082
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
What does this agreement mean in plain English? Items 1-4 deal mainly with the fact Amway didn’t get paid one penny for suing me, including paying their own attorney costs. As the judge decided my counterclaim would have to go arbitration, I also didn’t get anything from Amway for my counterclaim. It is well known the Amway arbitration process is unconscionable and illusory for a variety of reasons, so I obviously won’t be pursuing that path for my counterclaim.
Items 12-17 handle other administrative matters, which leaves items 5-11, the real “meat” of the agreement. Note the items keep me focused on the problem that needs to be solved, the Amway Tool Scam, and ensure I keep a positive reputation, so they are ALL favorable to me and the cause of shutting down the Amway Tool Scam.
Also note this does not give me permission to do things that are clearly illegal, such as rob an LCK’s house, etc. However, I WILL cause much more damage to Amway financially than they could dream in their worst nightmare. Amway will rue the day they tried to sue me and utterly FAILED in their inept attempt to silence me, ESPECIALLY since this agreement protects me against another idiotic SLAPP lawsuit. All I have to do is “color inside the lines,” and Amway has legally and permanently agreed they cannot sue me.
The main thing I gave up was communicating with IBOs, which I was finding to be both time consuming and having limited results, which frees up my time to be more productive in getting the Amway Tool Scam shut down. The following is a summary of these items, and note all of these items are directed towards me and those who associate with me regarding Amway and the Amway Tool Scam, referred to as “we” below:
5 – We cannot communicate with IBOs or those reasonably believed to be IBOs, unless the communication is not associated with Amway. Note the listed communications are defined and confined as directed to Amway IBO owned and/or operated media, and item 6 further reinforces this as well. Note there is almost unlimited ability in communicating with non-IBOs who are associated with Amway, such as Amway employees, lawyers, etc., UNLESS it is a public forum owned/operated by Amway or an IBO, which is also described in item 6. By omission, we can communicate with non-IBOs in private without restrictions, including 6-11 below. Note however, any private communications that are not consistent with 6-11 must remain private.
6 – Within the limits listed in 7-11, we CAN communicate publicly, as long as the communications are directed towards the general public. This means we can communicate publicly ABOUT Amway and the Amway Tool Scam, including IBOs, as long as the communications are directed to the public at large AND the public forum is not owned/operated by Amway or an IBO. By the way, this entire public blog IS directed towards the public at large. In other words, if an IBO posts on this blog, they can be responded to, without violating the agreement.
7 – No cussing, obscene language or images, or physical threats against Amway or those associated with their tool scam.
8 – Can’t blame or associate Amway and those related to Amway to any death, illness, or accident. However, there is a LOT of ground not covered by these restrictions, such as these actual examples:
Amway being accused of “roughing up”and threatening former employees when they sided with the legal authorities in Canada,
An IBO raping a 12 year old girl while selling door to door in San Diego,
Rich DeVos’ son in law, who was fired from running the Orlando Magic because he made a fool of himself by calling the franchise basketball player (Dwight Howard) while drunk and was reportedly sleeping around on his wife Cheri, Rich DeVos’ daughter.
9 – Can’t misappropriate the name, identity, or likeness, or violate the rights of privacy and publicity of Amway or those associated with Amway. However, this leaves a LOT of flexibility, as most of the people of public interest are also publicly visible, which severely limits their rights of privacy and publicity, AND the internet has provided a wealth of information regarding these dirtbags.
10 – Can’t state or create the impression we represent or are affiliated or are associated with Amway and their scam. This is probably the easiest one: Why would we want to be connected in any way to such an immoral and unethical operation in the first place?
11 – We can’t have others violate 5-10 in our place.
If you want to contact me directly, email stoptheamwaytoolscam@yahoo.com, you can even talk with me without giving up your phone number, just propose a time to call a free conference number (dial *67 before dialing, only your normal long distance charge, if any, to southern California where the conference call is based, applies) at (760) 569-6000, access code 975016. I am in the Central time zone, keep that in mind when setting up a call.
But the bottom line is you don't have a clue regarding the differences between a Ponzi scheme and an illegal pyramid. LOL
Come on Lynn the LOSER, answer the question I asked you on page 1 of this thread. LOL
Don't be a bigger coward than the people who won't make a phone call, but at least they post on the forum! LOL
But the bottom line is you don't have a clue regarding the differences between a Ponzi scheme and an illegal pyramid. LOL
TEXTEX SAYS = "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit "
TEXTEX says;
Oops,
I forgot,
nobody cares what Textex says.
After all Textex is the one bound by consent decrees, no one else here.
Back to normal programming
Too afraid to answer questions on your own forum! LOL
Does it get any more cowardly than that, Lynn? LOL
I don't think so! LOL
But the bottom line is Lynn the LOSER and/or another cowardly moderator keeps removing the below message, which gets the thread back on track. LOL
No, you didn't answer it. You were non-responsive. Here's the question again, this time I'll number the choices, just to make the task of answering easier for someone who you don't think is very bright:
1. How do I plan on getting organized?
2. Or how do I plan on taking down Amway?
3. Or both?
Pick 1, 2, or 3. Whether I'm bright or not isn't the issue, the issue is you can't answer a straight up question. Now what's your answer, Lynn?
P.S., you should have put a question mark after your first sentence. Of course you don't think I'm very bright, so that makes you even dimmer/dumber. LOL
But the bottom line is Lynn the LOSER and/or another cowardly moderator keeps removing the below message, which gets the thread back on track. LOL
Unless he isn't asking a question but making a statement of fact. If a statement of fact then no question mark is required.
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...15/175/c17.jpg
Oh, and you seem to have forgotten to post your 'below message' in Post #839;
When a post is edited it is generally displayed, as it is in Post #836;
Then the sentence structure sucked. Either way, you fail. LOL
And yet again, you can't answer a simple, multiple choice question, and there isn't even a right or wrong answer! LOL
Non-responsive = FAIL!!! LOL
Deal with it. LOL
It is not that you are stupid, but then again, you ARE! LOL
Lynn the LOSER has EARNED his name! LOL
Unless he isn't asking a question but making a statement of fact. If a statement of fact then no question mark is required. >>> Then his sentence structure sucked. Either way, he FAILS. LOL
Oh, and you seem to have forgotten to post your 'below message' in >>> You failed to communicate your point.
When a post is edited it is generally displayed, as it is in >>> Ditto. LOL
It's time to put some things into perspective for all of you who are reading this thread.
Textex has said that for nine years he has been after taking down Amway. In those nine years all he has done is blog about it. So he comes here and starts this thread saying, and I quote verbatim:
“Let's get organized and take action against Amway, the largest and most abusive MLM on the planet. Click my name to see my website. Who's in?”
To which I replied with this post: "So how do you plan on doing this? Which prompted Textex to answer with these questions, and again I quote verbatim:
“How do I plan on getting organized? Or how do I plan on taking down Amway? Or both? I think we can do Amway and Herbalife at the same time.”
Now textex wants you to believe that I didn't answer his questions, but I did answer them. Here is my reply to his three questions:
In the beginning I asked: what is your game plan, and then you responded with: How do I plan on getting organized? Or how do I plan on taking down Amway? Or both? You shouldn't have had to ask the questions because your game plan should contain "ALL" of what it is going to be required to take down Amway. If you had such a plan, you sure wouldn't need us as you would already be implementing it." As I said, he just didn't like my answer.
While my answer should have been obvious to Textex, let me explain to those reading this thread why I answered this way. If you state a goal, as he did, you expect the person to have put in place a game plan, or at least an outline of a game plan to accomplish the goal. I asked so as to save time as to what had been done or was being done, versus what still needed to be done. After all he had been going after Amway for nine years. You would think he would have some kind of game plan in place. He didn't even get the point of my reply, as here's his answer, and I quote verbatim:
"You never answered my question - let's start from there.
Why doesn't it make sense to have more than one person working against a $12 billion/year company (and it's high level distributors) that has been knowingly running a scam for several decades, ripping off millions of people for 100s of billions of dollars?
Are YOU willing to talk about this?
Thanks for taking some time to talk with me on the phone, I hope you didn't find it too scary (this is obviously directed to the others on this blog, but since the obvious often isn't when dealing with inferior life forms, I thought I would point it out explicitely!) LOL
Also, thanks for both your post and phone call, they were truly one of the first intelligent exchanges I've had on this blog."
In our phone conversation I explained that it was not part of Eagle's mission to research or investigate MLM programs unless one of law enforcement agencies asked us to do so to help them. That has not changed, nor will it. This is not about "Resume Enhancement." That has nothing to do with Eagle's dual mission.
So after about some 20 pages of posts give or take a few, Textex was upset that no-one seemed interested in helping him achieve his goal, and the name-calling started. If you didn't pick up the phone and call him, you were a coward. Actually it meant no-one was interested in talking with him or his goal of taking down Amway. Otherwise they would have called. Yet it is the fault of this forum this did not happen, according to Textex.
To make matters worse for Textex, he expanded his list of cowards to not only the regular posters here at RS, but also to anyone else who did not call him or want to help him. Any new person posting was immediately challenged to call him or they too were a coward and an idiot. And he wonders why no-one is calling him, let alone joining his efforts. Which leads me to my next point.
Textex made a post at behindMLM that I called him out on and not only said his statement was wrong, but gave him an explanation as to why. A fact he repeated here saying I "slammed" him at behindMLM when I did no such thing. I merely pointed out the fallacy of his statement with reasons why. If I was going to "slam" you, believe me I would have "slammed" you and you would have known it. Immediately the mantra began I didn't know the difference between a Ponzi and an illegal pyramid scheme, which he then brought to this forum and repeated it. So I went from being one of his most intelligent exchanges to being an idiot, coward and now loser.
Textex has gotten this idea that it is the job of people posting at RS to become part of his efforts, when the role of RS is to expose Ponzi's, illegal pyramid schemes, scams by providing a platform for people to post their opinions both for and against any program. if someone is interested in going further, that is their option to do so, but not a requirement to post here.
All Textex has done is repeat the same thing over and over and over and over. Einstein said: Insanity is doing the same things over and over expecting different results." How's those repetitive posts working out for you Textex?
While on the surface it would seem logical that the more people involved in an effort would produce faster results, that doesn't mean it would against Amway. In fact, the more people you have involved the more diluted the results will be. It is not the quantity of the team, but the quality of the team that is most effective.
Now to address you directly Textex. You seem to have this idea that I care about your calling me all these names. You are sadly mistaken. Not only do I not care, I find them laughable and hilarious. Not only do I not care about your lame insults, I don't care about your quest to take down Amway. I don't care because it is not what we do. In our phone conversation I told you some things you should consider doing, and that is the extent of our involvement. It is not our bag nor will it ever be unless we get the request from law enforcement for our help.
Besides, as I said before: You have the answer starring you right in the face and you don't see it. But one last question for you: Since you claimed that you have accomplished your mission here, why in the world would this thread need to remain open?
On top of which, what is there about Textex' personality, behaviour or history which would encourage even the most dedicated anti Amway / MLM reader to become involved with him in any way ??Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleOne
REALSCAM.com isn't the only recipient of his self centered and childish behaviour.
He has a history over many years of behaving in the same manner in a number of forums and blogs, with, I might add, the same results, as far as attracting supporters to his cause goes.
The only difference between this and the other forums and blogs is we didn't banned him as soon as he started his childish tirades, preferring instead to let him destroy his own reputation, such as it is.
As the old saying goes: "Give 'em enough rope and let them hang themselves"
Since Textex, by his own admission, has achieved his mission here and proved his points, there is no need to continue this thread. It is now closed.