Solid Investment/SI thread at Legal Junkies

[EagleOne]

After years and years and years (going into the 13th year) Don Quixote has regaled his followers with what a great job the First Payee, who we know is Crystal Schultz, had been doing. To hear him tell it she can leap tall blades of grass in a single jump, bend noodles with her bare hands, faster than a speeding ant, more powerful than a bottle of Ex-lax and deserves a medal and a bonus for all her hard work. Still despite all the accolades tossed her way, all of their filings, whether a criminal complaint, demand for administrative accounting and fiduciary responsibility, request for assistance, or petitions to enforce court orders or appoint oversight resulted in zero, nil, zilch, nothing, nada, zero results; but the payments were going to happen. A poster has provided an insight into all of Crystal's "accomplishments" for all to see, and I appreciate his listing all her failures. Here's her list of accomplishments, and I quote:

"To the criminal complaint
Crystal L Schultz from 22.03.2019
against a large number of persons named by name
because of the accusation § 263 StGB and others
the initiation of preliminary proceedings is rejected (§§ 152 Paragraph 2 in conjunction with § 160 Paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).
Reasons:
The criminal complaint made by the person making the report does not reveal any criminal acts of the reporters, in particularly it does not describe any facts that are self-explanatory, but merely refers to external events and legally appreciates them. Since in this respect crime periods from 2007 - 2013 are mentioned, any underlying offences - here the regular limitation period of 5 years according to the German Penal Code for the designated offences - are also likely to be statute-barred.
The initiation of investigations was therefore to be rejected (§ 152 para. 2 StPO).
Instructions on legal remedies:
An appeal against this decision to the General Prosecutor in Frankfurt am Main is admissible within 2 weeks of the announcement. By filing the complaint with the public prosecutor's office in Frankfurt am Main (see sender's address), the time limit is observed.
Karl
public prosecutor

On August 22, 2014 our German legal counsel sent a letter requesting information about the status of our case to Dr. Poseck. He responded via letter that he knew nothing of our matter while we had direct knowledge that he had been in weekly contact with our administrators.
➢ On January 06, 2015 our Australian legal counsel sent a letter requesting information about the status of our case to Dr. Poseck. He responded via unofficial e-mail that he knew nothing of our matter while we had direct knowledge that he was continuing his weekly contact with our administrators.
➢ On September 27, 2015 a “Demand for Administrative Accounting and Fiduciary Responsibility” was filed with service per ‘Article 3 of the Permanent Court of Arbitration and The Hague Service Convention’ to 37 respondents including 19 high level German officials (see entire filing on www(dot)shortfingereddonald(dot)com and then click ‘The Hague’). All service was ignored.
➢ On October 21, 2016 on behalf of Jean N. Ott, a resident of the German State of Thüringen, a request for assistance was sent to the General Prosecutor’s office. Our request was ignored.
➢ On April 14, 2017 UCC Financing Statements were filed in the United States against all German assets in the states of New York and Washington, including assets in the Federal Reserve Bank and Deutsche Telekom. All were ignored.
➢ On January 22, 2018 a “Petition to Enforce Court Orders” was filed with the Frankfurt am Main Higher Regional Court as judicial trustee and oversight. Ignored!
➢ On February 26, 2018 a Petition to Appoint Oversight” were filed with the Frankfurt am Main Higher Regional Court as judicial trustee and oversight. Ignored!
➢ In the period October 2018 to January 2019, approximately 500 victims filed their claims for payment to the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main as judicial trustee and oversight. Ignored!
➢ On December 10, 2018 a ‘Criminal Complaint” – English version – was filed with the General Prosecutor’s Office Frankfurt am Main. It was ignored on the justification that the notification case was not filed in accordance with §184 GVG, i.e. not in German. It is incomprehensible that this was not communicated directly to the complainant, but only after a lawyer had been called in.
➢ On March 16, 2019 the lawyer received that information with the Ref.-Nr. 1 AR 425/18.
➢ On March 22, 2019 the above mentioned ‘Criminal Complaint” was refiled as German version with the General Prosecutor’s Office Frankfurt am Main - Ref.-Nr.: 1 AR 425/18. This could no longer be ignored and was for reasons of competence referred to the Public Prosecutor Frankfurt am Main – Ref.-Nr.: 7580 AR 301122/19.
➢ On April 27, 2019 the complainant was informed by the Frankfurt am Main public prosecutor's office that the initiation of an investigation procedure had been rejected.
➢ On April 02, 2019 once more a letter was filed with Dr. Roman Poseck, President of the Higher Regional Court Frankfurt am Main as judicial trustee and oversight attached with the two afore mentioned petitions in German language. Ignored!
➢ On May 05, 2019 the complainant filed an appeal against this decision with the Frankfurt am Main General Prosecutor's Office.
➢ On June 08, 2019, the complainant was informed by the Frankfurt General Prosecutor's Office that her appeal had been rejected.
The more the victims have made this matter public, the more the arguments have changed.
➢ Ms. Schultz and her American legal counsel Mr. Douglas Ramler, met with the Barbara Müller, Honorary Counsel for the Federal Republic of Germany in February 2016 to discuss a way to resolve this matter. Upon seeing our evidence, she contacted her superiors in Chicago, Il. USA requesting permission to assist in resolving this matter. She was informed this was a “private legal matter” and to cease communications.
➢ In July 2017, in response to a telephone conversation, Ms. Schultz received an e-mail response from Prof. Dr. Köhler’s office stating he could not assist because this is a “private litigation matter.” However, when asked to assist in an unofficial capacity, he again was unable to get involved as Germany has accepted global jurisdiction and is insisting on their right to control all aspects of this matter. Ultimately, as with Ms. Müller, whom we approached to resolve this matter, the person was instructed to cease all communication.
➢ Then in turn, the Federal Republic of Germany argues, in response to requests from victims for payments not yet received, that all payments had been made. As soon as invoices and UCC liens submitted by victims are referred to by international journalists, it is then admitted that the escrow accounts are fully funded and available, and it is explained that the only reason for non-payment is the absence of valid claims.
➢ Finally, when victims make official claims to the court for payment, there is the most absurd argument that victims should prove non-payment. The fact is, it is the responsibility of the court appointed administrators and judicial trustee to protect the rights of the victims and ensure all court decisions are enforced."

But the story is that criminal complaints and actions will soon be filed against all of us exposing Don Quixote's lies and for the Legal Junkies Forum for letting us post our lies and defaming Don Quixote, or some nonsense like that. This list shoots that story line down. Can hardly wait to see the replies to the post. Wonder if all of Don Quixote's supporters who have been quite vocal of late will now slink back into silence.