We now have a third story line in the saga of the supposedly filing of a case for arbitration with the Hague Permanent Arbitration Court. The first story was, and I quote:

""He claims to have contacted the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which reported to him that no case number had been filed by the named arbitration claimants, and, according to Edgington, there should have if the case had been filed.

No arbitration case number is ever assigned at filing because arbitration is not a legal matter, but a disagreement between private parties. Consequently, arbitration decisions cannot be appealed for the same reason.

Arbitration is a matter between private parties who want to settle their differences in private. Thus, in all arbitration matters, a case number is assigned only after a decision has been made and an award has come down, but not before.

So, it appears that Eagle Research, Inc. failed in its investigation because it did not understand how arbitration worked. But, as its president, Lynndel Edgington continued to falsely assert that no arbitration action had ever taken place because he could not find a case number for it."

When I proved that story was a lie, then the story changed to, and again I quote:

"In arbitration, no award can ever come down if certain issues should come up, such as criminal activity.

No award can ever come down in this case because the arbitrators discovered that the money in question had been stolen.

As a result, the arbitration claimants have made the decision to file an action in the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

In addition to others, those named in the complaint will be:

1. John D Lier, alias BJH.
2. Lynndel Edgington.
3. The owners and operators of the Internet site containing this forum thread.

The charge will be "Interference With The Administration of Justice," a crime under The Rome Statute.

This criminal complaint will be filed sometime on, or before, 1 April 2018."

When I proved that story was false, then they came up with this version of the story, and again I quote:


"Arbitration is not like a legal case. It is like two neighbors who are using the same lawn mower and can't agree on who actually owns it. So, they call in a third party to arbitrate the issue for them. That is why arbitration decisions cannot be appealed, because they are not legal, judicial proceedings.

As such, whenever an arbitration issue is filed anywhere, Permanent Court of Arbitration, The American Arbitration Association, or whatever, a case number is assigned FOR IN HOUSE USE ONLY so they can keep track of it amongst themselves.

Then, the arbitration officials conduct an investigation to determine if the persons, and the issues raised by them, are suitable for arbitration.

After they determine that everything is OK, then, and only then, do they notify the arbitration participants as to what the case number is.

Sometimes, the case number is not given out until a final award comes down and the case, and its number, is then posted on a website somewhere.

If, during the investigation, the officials determine there is anything that is not suitable for arbitration, such as issues containing civil or criminal components, the case is rejected for arbitration and, since it is not a legal or judicial proceeding, no notice is issued to the arbitration participants that their case no longer has standing.

This is what happened to the recent Hague pleading. The officials there determined that there were criminal issues (theft) that they had no jurisdiction over. And the Permanent Court of Arbitration said nothing was filed with them because their investigation revealed criminal activity and they rejected the whole thing prior to notifying the arbitration participants of the case number.

Contacting The Hague and asking them if there is a case number on this, they will reply that there is no case because it had been secretly dismissed by them and they were not required to notify anyone that this decision had been made because it is an arbitration not a legal or judicial proceeding.

By the way, electronic signatures were added to the pleading just before it was sent to The Hague via email. Therefore, the original completed pleading now filed with the Short Fingered Donald site would have no signatures on them because none were physically executed."

I just debunked this new story line, so I can't wait to see what version they come up with next, but you can rest assured that they will come up with something.

This is getting to be more fun than a human being should be allowed to have. The mental midgets are out in force and are alive and well on the Legal Junkies forum.