Quote Originally Posted by ribshaw View Post
I don't see how any of that points out any "flaws" in my "argument", when in fact I didn't make an "argument" but several observations about pollution in general. I used ONE example, of human waste and it was not a "complaint" but a fact. I am not writing a Phd dissertation on the ecosystem to satisfy your every whim.

And to quote myself:

"The vast majority of the world's scientists are in agreement that polluting the atmosphere has consequences, the only question is to what degree." and

"There is a consequence to every action. If we pump a bunch of crap into the sky, the water, or the land it will eventually do damage."

As I said previous times, I could care less about your cut and paste science class. I have ONE choice in my area for powering my house, electric, my guess is it is derived from coal, but since I don't have a choice I just pay my bill. I have ONE choice for Heat and that is natural gas, again I just pay my bill. It seems like natural gas is a huge boon for America, as long as companies don't F' up our water supply. And it is probably better for the environment. But again I have 0 choice so I pay my bill.

I am not really sure what your "hang up" is with Global Warming that you would be all over the internet cutting and pasting. Maybe if you want to engage people in an actual discussion rather than setting up a strawman and then arguing against it you would get a little further.
Amazing How when I post concrete facts to back up my arguments you call it cut and paste, just like a typical Stalinist Marxist Style Communist propagandist makes their arguments; attack the messenger and not the message. Because you are incapable of backing up any of your scientifically illiterate claims with any facts based on empirical measured data or experiments.

You seem to believe that only human poop polutes but deer poop, fish poop, whale poop, krill poop, Buffelo poop and Elk Poop doesn't. Krill makes up more than 2.5 times the biomass than what 7 billion humans do and produce many orders of magnitude more poop than humans do. Amazing how you clearly biased hatred of humans parallels Marxist Style Communist propagandist do to justify the irradiation of 7 billion people.

Here is a illustration published by the IPCC that demonstrates how very little contribution that humans really have to the CO2 build up in the Earth's atmosphere.

Plant Photosynthesis on the land alone absorbs more than 10 times the amount of CO2 that what humans produce each and every year. In this illistration it also shows the oceans are more than capable of absorbing more than 3 times as much CO2 than what humans can produce. Other research on this has shown as much as 200 times the CO2 absorption than what humans produce.

Also notice how plants and decaying plant life and animal life produces more than 20 times the CO2 compared to what humans produce.

And also remember that Water Vapor is the most dominant greenhouse gas of all, with more than 100 times the concentration in our atmosphere compared to what CO2 has in it. Water Vapor is 270 times the greenhouse gas is compared to what CO2 is.


Global Warming CO2 sources by quantity.JPG