Aside from the criminal references.
I will post an update on the Civil Litigations when they begin. You'll find that everything we do at Oceanside is transparent. (to a fault my partner says.)
It will take some time, and the expense will be a nice tax write off for us, and "hell for those who will need to hire counsel". (And you may be correct..... and we may or may not win. But it will send a message. If you want to challenge us. We will meet you.)
We can prove damages, and we will, and it will probably cost 100,000 in legal fees on our end.....and 100,000 in legal fees on the other side as well. At our present rate of growth......it will be an insignificant cost to us and we'll write it off in taxes.
There is already precedent for this type of cyberlaw, and I believe there is a recent case out of California where a woman won a judgement against a website owner for the proliferation of slander it contained against her. If we win....that's just icing on the cake.
People cannot legally say "Broker Jones is a scammer" without being able to prove it. They cannot legally say "Oceanside Network is a Ponzi" without being able to prove it.
Oh and our defendants? They all live in Texas conveniently.
Broker.....
There are 2 people at the top of our list. One is from Texarkana (funny thing is my wife is from there and it's a very small population so we had this address confirmed visually.) and the other is near Garland Texas.
Broker......
Are people going to get sued? Heck yes they are. Have people been reported to the authorities? Maybe.
Broker.....
I too found that absolutely hilarious. I guess the person who posted that doesn't know the power obsessed idiot for who she really is or the fact that she's trying to usurp scam dot com with her own website realscam dot com.
Power hungry attention starved drama queen.
You can tell her I said that.
But just examine the screen name: "Soap Box Mom"
That says it all to me.
Yes I did post the addresses of several well known trolls on my blog, as they had posted mine, screenshots of my house, my name, my address and even the square footage of my home. (None of which I really care about I have not, nor ever will be.....anonymous on the internet.) I believe you have the one in Garland incorrect however, and or maybe I do! SoJustAsk I happen to know personally "stickied" the Oceanside thread so her and her "gang" could bash my company relentlessly. (That's malicious intent right there, and the fact that they have stickied it and have made both my personal life and my company their personal agenda? Only makes it that much easier for me to prove damaged to Character, Reputation, Business, Mental Suffering......fear for my Wife and Children.....emotional damages, harm to the brand of Oceanside, potential loss of revenue.......need I go on? These are all very real charges and they do stand up in a court of law especially if you have read that thread in it's entirety and seen the types of posting going on. Our lawyers....Agree.)
My philosophy is that if you are going to attack people on the internet........
Anonymity is not something you deserve, and I let them know that point blank. If you want to post my personal stuff and attempt to hide behind your fake usernames.....I can and will find you. Their attacks on both me personally and my company have gone well beyond due dilligence and they are straight up 100% malicious.
The whole passive approach of "ignoring them and they will go away" ....well....I gotta be honest. It's not me, and probably never will be.
I've offered every bit of possible due dilligence and proof and verification to show that Oceanside is not a ponzi...nor a scam, but it is their goal to attack/slander and gain their 15 minutes of internet glory and power. And if that's their strategy....more power to them...I just hope they can afford the legal fees. (Oh....and we have a case alright. Like I said there is already precedent recently of many people winning over Internet Defamation, Slander and Lible.) But winning money? Is not our strategy.
You don't go into court on a civil litigation expecting to win a whole bunch of money.
We are arming ourselves to the proverbial teeth with attorneys. (Give us a year and we will be the absolute last company you want to slander on the internet, and we fully intend to engage in a 6 figure lawsuit against a few of these people, and stick their proverbial heads on a pike on the bridge outside England.....sorry...big Braveheart fan.....not necessarily a Mel Gibson fan anymore though...uggggh.)
I'm willing to bet after the first large court case......the slander, defamation and "keyboard courage" will vanish, in regards to Broker Jones, Justin Kaiser, and Oceanside. In fact, we're willing to put a large sum of legal fees on that point. (...and I know....some people on here are going to tell me "you can't do that Justin...")
But I've heard that before.
~Free Your Life, Live Your Dreams~
Justin "Broker" Jones...
The two at the top of our list for civil litigation were not necessarily in the order posted on my blog and perhaps it is I who is mistaken on the Garland address.....
I actually never got any IP addresses from Len whom you are obviously referring to. Len and I were working on a completely different project altogether. It was a compilation of Google, Email addresses attached to usernames on different forums that "unmasked" said villains.
Broker
@Lady Mod See you in court!
....
Bookmarks