Thread: Zeek Rewards !! How to get to $3K a month, starting as a free member !

Read the "reply to SEC" (document 101). It's rather funny. They can't actually articulate a good reason for the appointment, as they just keep harping about the Stanford case, and how an examiner would represent the affiliates.

What SEC and receiver really need to do is stop referring to everybody as victims, and separate the affiliates into three groups: winners that are fighting, winners that are cooperating, and losers. Then the fighting winners can petition to court to pay for their own counsel. It's clear the receiver's job is to make whole the losers by f***ing the winners, who deserve to be f***ed. The ones that are collaborating gets lube, the fighting ones get it dry. ;)

The liability was AT LEAST $3 billion and could have been as large as $6 billion.

Date Filed # Docket Text
01/07/2013 105 MOTION to Seal by Paul R. Burks.Responses due by 1/25/2013 (Sussman, Jacob) (Entered: 01/07/2013)

01/07/2013 106 SEALED MOTION (Sealed - Attorney) by Paul Burks; (available to Paul R. Burks, Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC, Rex Venture
Group, LLC, Securities and Exchange Commission)Responses due by 1/25/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Subpoena (8/24/12), # 2 Exhibit Letter (10/17/12), # 3 Exhibit Letter (10/31/12), # 4 Exhibit Letter (10/31/12), # 5 Exhibit Log (11/16/12), # 6 Exhibit Subpoena (11/21/12), # 7 Exhibit Receiver's Response (1/4/13), # 8 Exhibit Letter (12/14/12), # 9 Exhibit Updated Log (12/14/12), # 10 Exhibit Letter (12/14/12), # 11 Exhibit Affidavit (1/7/13), # 12 Exhibit Affidavit (1/7/13))(Sussman, Jacob) (Entered: 01/07/2013)

01/07/2013 107 NOTICE of Appearance by Rodney E. Alexander on behalf of Robert Craddock (Alexander, Rodney) (Entered: 01/07/2013)

01/07/2013 108 RESPONSE in Opposition re 92 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Recent Movants by Robert Craddock, Fun Club USA, Inc., David Kettner, Mary Kettner, David Sorrells. Replies due by 1/17/2013 (Alexander, Rodney) (Entered: 01/07/2013)

More from Craddock:

LATEST NEWS

News update, if you had multiple accounts with Zeek Rewards you need to list each account as a separate registration, this will have multiple benefits for you in the coming weeks, be sure to list the username, the sponsor username and the sponsors, sponsor username also for each account.

As you go to register each account you do need to use a different email address as that is the way you login to and create a new account under Zteambiz.net

If you are confused why get with your leaders and they will explain the reason and how this will affect you in a positive way.

Thanks

Robert

Date Filed # Docket Text

01/07/2013 109 RESPONSE in Opposition re 92 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Recent Movants Exhibits A, B and C by Robert Craddock, Fun Club USA, Inc., David Kettner, Mary Kettner, David Sorrells. Replies due by 1/17/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C)(Alexander, Rodney) (Entered: 01/07/2013)

01/09/2013 110 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 80 MOTION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING RELEASE OF FROZEN THIRD-PARTY ASSETS by Securities and Exchange Commission.Responses due by 1/28/2013 (Bowers, John) (Entered: 01/09/2013)

Date Filed # Docket Text

01/11/2013 111 ORDER granting 110 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re 80 MOTION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING RELEASE OF FROZEN THIRD-PARTY ASSETS Responses due by 1/12/2013. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/10/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) (Entered: 01/11/2013)

01/11/2013 112 RESPONSE in Opposition re 84 MOTION to Intervene and for an Order Dissolving the Appointment of a Temporary Receiver and Memorandum in Support Thereof by Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC. Replies due by 1/22/2013 (Brenner, Irving) (Entered: 01/11/2013)

01/11/2013 113 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 84 MOTION to Intervene and for an Order Dissolving the Appointment of a Temporary Receiver and Memorandum in Support Thereof by Securities and Exchange Commission. Replies due by 1/22/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit attaching true copy of ZeekRewards website)(Bowers, John) (Entered: 01/11/2013)

Date Filed # Docket Text

01/16/2013 114 NOTICE by Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC re 92 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Recent Movants Notice of Consent to Enter Order Granting Motion to Compel (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Brenner, Irving) (Entered: 01/16/2013)

01/16/2013 115 ORDER denying as moot 73 Motion to Quash. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/16/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) (Entered: 01/16/2013)

Date Filed # Docket Text

01/17/2013 116 Consent MOTION for Protective Order by Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC.Responses due by 2/4/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Brenner, Irving) (Entered: 01/17/2013)

01/17/2013 117 ORDER granting 92 Motion to Compel. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/17/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) (Entered: 01/17/2013)

Did the zeek owner was charged with criminal charges?

Originally Posted by strosdegoz

Did the zeek owner was charged with criminal charges?

Not yet to my knowledge, but in my opinion it will only be a matter of time.

Date Filed # Docket Text

01/18/2013 118 RESPONSE in Support re 84 MOTION to Intervene and for an Order Dissolving the Appointment of a Temporary Receiver and Memorandum in Support Thereof by Trudy Gilmond, Kellie King. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Kellie King, # 2 Declaration of Trudy Gilmond)(Sorkin, Ira) (Entered: 01/18/2013)

Originally Posted by strosdegoz

Did the zeek owner was charged with criminal charges?

What he said, it is a matter of time...

Thanks for the reply.

It's incredible that you can run the widest spread ponzi in the history of the United States of America and still have no criminal charges after this long.

Originally Posted by strosdegoz

Thanks for the reply.

It's incredible that you can run the widest spread ponzi in the history of the United States of America and still have no criminal charges after this long.

Nah, it's completely normal, stros.

It can take up to 2 years before criminal charges are laid in the case of a HYIP ponzi, even longer when it's as big as Zeek was.

ESPECIALLY when the people behind the fraud have either deliberately or carelessly not kept accurate records AND tried to hide as much as they could.

BUT,

rest assured, when someone gets nailed for running a HYIP ponzi, they stay NAILED.

Originally Posted by strosdegoz

Thanks for the reply.

It's incredible that you can run the widest spread ponzi in the history of the United States of America and still have no criminal charges after this long.

The Feds are also just part of the game....I bet they just love to make the admin sweat for a year or more b4 they bring charges....

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Nah, it's completely normal, stros.

It can take up to 2 years before criminal charges are laid in the case of a HYIP ponzi, even longer when it's as big as Zeek was.

ESPECIALLY when the people behind the fraud have either deliberately or carelessly not kept accurate records AND tried to hide as much as they could.

BUT,

rest assured, when someone gets nailed for running a HYIP ponzi, they stay NAILED.

Thanks again for the info.

Heard that Dawn Wright-Olivares finally popped up on the scope... having started some sort of radio / podcast with Peter Mingliss (sp?)

Yes, you heard that right. Here's a link

Come Create Your Own Utopia @ the Dash 01/16 by The Dash | Blog Talk Radio

Originally Posted by Wizzard7

Yes, you heard that right. Here's a link

Come Create Your Own Utopia @ the Dash 01/16 by The Dash | Blog Talk Radio

If you click on that link and look at the pictures of Peter and Dawn... wow, I mean, I thought these were 6 and 7 figure earners and they have such terrible profile pictures, Dawn in particular. Peter looks like he just got lectured by a court judge and the makeup and lighting is terrible.

Originally Posted by strosdegoz

Thanks for the reply.

It's incredible that you can run the widest spread ponzi in the history of the United States of America and still have no criminal charges after this long.

It's amazing that YOU can pimp most of the obvious ponzi scams in the history of the internet and not go to jail!

Originally Posted by busttheblock

It's amazing that YOU can pimp most of the obvious ponzi scams in the history of the internet and not go to jail!

Location, location, location.

Speaking of jail, refunds, etc. Would any of you be interested in a small side bet? I'm willing to bet $5 that the admin will not go to jail and another $5 that no clawbacks from those outside of the U.S. will occur. Any takers?

Originally Posted by Finix

Speaking of jail, refunds, etc. Would any of you be interested in a small side bet? I'm willing to bet $5 that the admin will not go to jail and another $5 that no clawbacks from those outside of the U.S. will occur. Any takers?

LOL, proposing a little illegal internet gambling, huh...?

A small bet between us girls would hardly constitute illegal gambling, but as you like. It was something in a way of putting money where your mouth is which none of you are ever willing to do.

I'm in, on both. Paul Burkes going to jail is a gimme, I'll take the chance that at the very least overseas winners in the EU are gonna have to cough up some cash. I think it also likely some in supposed "overseas havens" in central america and some caribbean islands will allow clawbacks, Gietner has in the last year hinted that if these jurisdictions didn't start playing ball when the US had evidence he might just cut them off from access to the US banking system.