PDA

View Full Version : Realscam and Its Admins Have a Fan Club!!! We Do Conspire to Expose Scammers!



Soapboxmom
11-24-2011, 09:35 PM
From: John Lawless <littleroundsoapboxmom@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:49 PM
Subject: Interesting Site you have
To: soapboxmom@hotmail.com

I dont sell anything but I do believe in facts and stopping scams. This is interesting: REALSCAM.COM may live up to it's name? - REALTRUTH.ORG (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/show/10527500-realscam-org-may-live-up-to-it-s-name)
REALTRUTH.ORG (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)




Home (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)
Contact Us (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/contactus.htm)
News (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/)
Members (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/members/)



News

« Back to News (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/)« Older Entry (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/show/prev?from_id=10527500) | Newer Entry » (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/show/next?from_id=10527500)
REALSCAM.COM may live up to it's name? (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/show/10527500-realscam-com-may-live-up-to-it-s-name-)



http://thumbs.webs.com/s/viewProfilePic/?siteId=84278624&memberId=84278582&size=square&246515 (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/) Posted by littleroundsoapboxmom (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/) on November 24, 2011 at 8:25 PM





REAL
a. Being or occurring in fact or actuality; having verifiable existence: real objects; a real illness.
b. True and actual; not imaginary, alleged, or ideal: real people, not ghosts; a film based on real life.
SCAM
a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation
This is great! An organization that will stop fraud!
FRAUD
1. deliberate deception, trickery, or cheating intended to gain an advantage
2. an act or instance of such deception
3. something false or spurious: his explanation was a fraud
4. informal a person who acts in a false or deceitful way
Fantastic! Nothing better than putting scammers on the run!
PROOF OF FRAUD
It is the claimant who has the burden of proof — the person who asserts that certain business practices are fraudulent is the person who should be presenting the primary evidence and arguments backed by documented facts in support of what they allege, not just hearsay. If they do not, then there is no rational reason to believe them. Saying something is fraud with no actual documentation or supporting facts is considered libel.
Oh oh! Libel is not a good thing is it?
LIBEL
1. Defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.
2. The act or crime of publishing it.
3. A formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
4. Anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents.
I thought it was finding REAL Scams?
RealScam.com portrays itself as a site where you can help bust up scams. The question is by what means? If what they are doing is illegal then what does that make them?
None of their accusations are followed up with supporting documentation, there are no supporting links to visit for proof nor are there any posts on any of these threads that counter any allegations.
Are these countering posts deleted?
They have several members who in fact hide behind User Names and from what I can tell never divulge their real name. Why?
If they are purporting something regarding a scam involving real names of individuals or programs why do they not show their courage of their convictions and post as a real person?
I have gone through most of their posts and I have not yet found one instance where they have successfully proven or shut down anything based on any actual evidence.
This entire site appears to be is a group of individuals that are unhappy with their lot in life and find it necessary to attack others. There are posts regarding the integrity of an individual and his family’s health, there are personal attacks on individuals who are not selling anything and plain old fashioned name calling that comes across as pure hatred based on nothing more than speculation.
They want to prosecute, judge and sentence any individual that crosses them, not on facts but rather based on the concept either you agree with us or you are an enemy. I am not sure what you would call that but I believe the world went to war trying to stop that kind of mentality.

Categories: None

Post a Comment

NameAlready a member? Sign In (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/login)
Email
Message














0 Comments

Members Area (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/)

Sign In (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/login?try=1&next=apps%2Fblog%2Fentries%2Fshow%2F10527500%2Drea lscam%2Dorg%2Dmay%2Dlive%2Dup%2Dto%2Dit%2Ds%2Dname ) or Register (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/signup?next=apps%2Fblog%2Fentries%2Fshow%2F1052750 0%2Drealscam%2Dorg%2Dmay%2Dlive%2Dup%2Dto%2Dit%2Ds %2Dname)

Recent Blog Entries (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/)

http://images.freewebs.com/Images/Silk/page_white_text.pngREALSCAM.COM may live up to it's name? (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/show/10527500-realscam-com-may-live-up-to-it-s-name-)
by littleroundsoapboxmom (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/) | 0 comments



Copyright ©2011

Start a Free Blog at Webs.com (http://www.webs.com/)


REALTRUTH.ORG (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)




Home (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)
Contact Us (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/contactus.htm)
News (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/)
Members (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/members/)





Members
Join Site (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/signup)







All Members (1)
http://static.websimages.com/static/global/icons/silk/application_view_tile.png (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/members/membersList?offset=1&q=&sort=DISPLAY_NAME&view=grid)http://static.websimages.com/static/global/icons/silk/application_view_list.png (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/members/membersList?offset=1&q=&sort=DISPLAY_NAME&view=list)








Sort by Display NameLast LoginCreation DateMember PermissionsRandom







http://thumbs.webs.com/s/viewProfilePic/?siteId=84278624&memberId=84278582&size=square&548694 (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/)
littleroundsoapboxmom (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/)
Site Owner
Winnipeg, Canada









Members Area (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/)

Sign In (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/login?try=1&next=apps%2Fmembers%2F) or Register (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/signup?next=apps%2Fmembers%2F)


Recent Blog Entries (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/)

http://images.freewebs.com/Images/Silk/page_white_text.pngREALSCAM.COM may live up to it's name? (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/show/10527500-realscam-com-may-live-up-to-it-s-name-)
by littleroundsoapboxmom (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/) | 0 comments



Copyright ©2011

Get Free Hosting at Webs.com (http://www.webs.com/)
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif (http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=120&winname=addthis&pub=webs&source=men-120&lng=en&s=&url=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fme mbers%2F&title=Members%20-%20REALTRUTH.ORG&logo=&logobg=&logocolor=&ate=AT-webs/-/-/4ecefe0b1ad82cfe/1&frommenu=1&uid=4ecefe0b801b3054&pre=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fbl og%2Fentries%2Fshow%2F10527500-realscam-org-may-live-up-to-it-s-name&tt=0)




Domain ID:D107522970-LROR
Domain Name:REALTRUTH.ORG
Created On:18-Sep-2005 19:09:19 UTC
Last Updated On:19-Aug-2011 04:39:27 UTC
Expiration Date:18-Sep-2012 19:09:19 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R39-LROR)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:7A19ABAC5145DFA1
Registrant Name:Information Services Department
Registrant Organization:The Restored Church of God
Registrant Street1:PO Box 23295
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Wadsworth
Registrant State/Province:OH
Registrant Postal Code:44282
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.3303342266
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:http://source.domaintools.com/email.pgif?md5=998466d25a1907d21ce1c021f0637085&face=arial&size=9&color=000000&bgcolor=FFFFFF&face=arial&size=9&color=0000FF&bgcolor=FFFFFF&format[]=underline&format[]=transparent&format[]=transparent (http://www.domaintools.com/research/reverse-whois/?email=998466d25a1907d21ce1c021f0637085)
Admin ID:7A19ABAC5145DFA1
Admin Name:Information Services Department
Admin Organization:The Restored Church of God
Admin Street1:PO Box 23295
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:Wadsworth
Admin State/Province:OH
Admin Postal Code:44282
Admin Country:US
Admin Phone:+1.3303342266
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:http://source.domaintools.com/email.pgif?md5=998466d25a1907d21ce1c021f0637085&face=arial&size=9&color=000000&bgcolor=FFFFFF&face=arial&size=9&color=0000FF&bgcolor=FFFFFF&format[]=underline&format[]=transparent&format[]=transparent (http://www.domaintools.com/research/reverse-whois/?email=998466d25a1907d21ce1c021f0637085)
Tech ID:7A19ABAC5145DFA1
Tech Name:Information Services Department
Tech Organization:The Restored Church of God
Tech Street1:PO Box 23295
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Wadsworth
Tech State/Province:OH
Tech Postal Code:44282
Tech Country:US
Tech Phone:+1.3303342266
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:http://source.domaintools.com/email.pgif?md5=998466d25a1907d21ce1c021f0637085&face=arial&size=9&color=000000&bgcolor=FFFFFF&face=arial&size=9&color=0000FF&bgcolor=FFFFFF&format[]=underline&format[]=transparent&format[]=transparent (http://www.domaintools.com/research/reverse-whois/?email=998466d25a1907d21ce1c021f0637085)
Name Server:NS3.P23.DYNECT.NET
Name Server:NS1.P23.DYNECT.NET
Name Server:NS2.P23.DYNECT.NET
Name Server:NS4.P23.DYNECT.NET
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
DNSSEC:Unsigned

Soapboxmom
11-24-2011, 09:38 PM
Website Title:
http://source.domaintools.com/thumbnail.pgif?version=1&username=magichans&key=ghqfv-81528-nwonz-58583-sxjkf&url=realtruth.org&size=1 The Real Truth - A Magazine Restoring Plain Understanding (http://www.realtruth.org/)


Title Relevancy
62%


Compete Rank:
http://img.domaintools.com/compete-cache/profile_3_16.gif #41,091 (http://go.domaintools.com/go/?compete=realtruth.org)with 49,990 Unique visitors per month


Quantcast Rank:
#720,866 (http://go.domaintools.com/go/?quantcast=realtruth.org)


DMOZ:
1 listings (http://directory.domaintools.com/realtruth.org)


DMOZ Title:
The Real Truth Magazine


DMOZ Description:
A magazine of The Restored Church of God.


DMOZ Category:
/ Society / Religion and Spirituality / Christianity / Denominations / Churches of God /


Wikipedia:
3 pages (http://directory.domaintools.com/enwikipedia/realtruth.org)




AboutUs:
http://img.domaintools.com/aboutus.png Wiki article on Realtruth.org (http://www.aboutus.org/Realtruth.org)



SEO Score (http://www.domaintools.com/seo-score/):
73%


Terms:
623 (Unique: 338, Linked: 251)


Images:
7 (Alt tags missing: 2)


Links:
80 (Internal: 66, Outbound: 11)


Similar Domains:
realtrac.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtrac.com), realtoy.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtoy.com), realtracker.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtracker.com), realtra.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtra.com), realtoys.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtoys.com), realtrace.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtrace.com),realtracks.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtracks.com), realtoyotaparts.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtoyotaparts.com), realtowncommunities.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtowncommunities.com), realtoyorgasms.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtoyorgasms.com),realtracksport.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtracksport.com), realtracksystems.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtracksystems.com), realtownship.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtownship.com), realtoyz.com (http://whois.domaintools.com/realtoyz.com)


RSS Feeds:
A “Good Education”? – What Stands in the Way (15303 days ago (http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/real-truth/%7E3/iP4-JXCgjaw/110819-003.html))




Search Engine Preview (View details (http://www.domaintools.com/seo-browser/?domain=realtruth.org))

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ______
I should be thanking our admirer for sending more visitors our way! Think how many more wonderful folks can be saved from falling for a scam!

Soapboxmom

Soapboxmom
11-24-2011, 11:27 PM
RealScam.com portrays itself as a site where you can help bust up scams. The question is by what means? If what they are doing is illegal then what does that make them?
None of their accusations are followed up with supporting documentation, there are no supporting links to visit for proof nor are there any posts on any of these threads that counter any allegations.
Are these countering posts deleted?
I happen to be degreed in secondary and higher education. I see you, my pet, are in need of a remedial reading class. Reading for content above that suitable for the primary grades is obviously not your strong suit.

Explain exactly what is being done on RS that is illegal. Posts here are rarely removed. The admins will remove content in accordance with the rules and at their discretion, but never simply because it contains a dissenting opinion. I see you didn't notice the thousands of pages of court documents and public record that I have personally posted? I take it you are planning on generating thousands more???

Soapboxmom

Soapboxmom
11-24-2011, 11:29 PM
If they are purporting something regarding a scam involving real names of individuals or programs why do they not show their courage of their convictions and post as a real person?
That of course explains why you are not using your real name. The name of the poster is actually immaterial. The veracity of the postings is the issue and you haven't provided on single instance of any false statement of fact and refuted it with the documentation you have been braying about. Let's have it Einstein!

Soapboxmom

littleroundman
11-25-2011, 12:05 AM
Gee,

how flattering.

One wonders, though, where all these official sounding definitions originate.

I particularly like the one about "burden of proof"

Sounds like exactly the sort of definition which led to the introduction of anti S.L.A.P.P. legislation to me.

I always find it interesting that people like "littleroundsoapboxmom (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/)" go to all the trouble of shooting the messenger, exposing (or attempting to expose) posters' real names and/or details, putting up free websites, derailing and distracting discussions and attempting to intimidate posters, yet never, ever address the core issue/s.

All I can think is that such people are part of that sub strata of society where "greed is good" rules and principles such as "love thy neighbour" "integrity" and "truth" belong to a bygone era.

What was that thing the nuns used to advise when faced with a dilemma of conscience ??

Ah yes,

"WHAT WOULD JESUS DO"

One wonders if the "Restored Church of God" has chapters on how "rationalize and justify your way to redemption" in whichever version of the Bible it uses.

I'll just bet its' version has a drastically altered Matthew 21:12 (http://bible.cc/matthew/21-13.htm)And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

Whip
11-25-2011, 01:18 AM
I happen to be degreed in secondary and higher education. I see you, my pet, are in need of a remedial reading class. Reading for content above that suitable for the primary grades is obviously not your strong suit.

Explain exactly what is being done on RS that is illegal. Posts here are rarely removed. The admins will remove content in accordance with the rules and at their discretion, but never simply because it contains a dissenting opinion. I see you didn't notice the thousands of pages of court documents and public record that I have personally posted? I take it you are planning on generating thousands more???

Soapboxmom

I guess they feel they'll lie their way through court like they do through life.

littleroundman
11-25-2011, 01:42 AM
Saying something is fraud with no actual documentation or supporting facts is considered libel.

REALLY ??

That simple, eh ??

Whatever happened to "some truths are self evident"

The whole spiel reminds me of the type of false logic in which the notorious serial pest, EddieBoy aka Uncle Festa aka Eddie Campbell would indulge.

Mind you, as annoying as he can be, I don't think even he would try and use religion to further his cause.

Take the line:


nor are there any posts on any of these threads that counter any allegations. Are these countering posts deleted?

Well, hello.

The forum is known as REALSCAM.com (http://www.realscam.com) and there's no "countering posts"

What sort of leap of logic is required to get to "are these countering posts deleted"

Wouldn't it be far simpler to assume fraudsters are smart enough to stay far, far away ??

As in: "REALSCAM.com (http://www.realscam.com) isn't Talkgold or MMG or some half assed pseudo anti scam forum which encourages "debate" because it's good for business"

Lil Ol' Radical Me
11-25-2011, 09:09 PM
Registrant Organization:The Restored Church of God

Good Grief, it makes you wonder what was so wrong with the Church of God that it had to be restored! Didn't they like the parts that told you to do as you would be done by? Or was it the "thou shalt not covet thy neighbours goods" that they objected to, or "thou shalt not steal"? Never mind, now it has been restored and greed and theft by fraud is fine and those nasty people at Real Scam who object to this restoration are ..... well ... they are just being beastly and I am going to tell my mom!

Soapboxmom
11-29-2011, 02:34 PM
Our fan club has exploded to a whopping 5 members. Peter Fogel is whining and sadly a victim of this sour economy and the F5 millionaires Club was stupid enough to put her name and picture up. She opined:

They really should "put up or shut up" There is no documented proof about anything they bash on their site. I agree with this post, if they are going to slander people by name, they should "man up" and show the world who they are. Personally, I do not find cartoons and fake names to be a very credible way of conducting real business online!
The true tragedy in all this is the desperate, economically disadvantage people who get victimized on Adlandpro. Their lives are challenging enough already. How does Bogdan Fiedur sleep at night???

Soapboxmom

Soapboxmom
11-29-2011, 10:32 PM
REALTRUTH.ORG (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)






Maurice Bernier
Browse all members (5) (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/members/)









Main (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84470551/)
Friends (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84470551/friends/)




http://thumbs.webs.com/s/viewProfilePic/?siteId=84278624&memberId=84470551&size=normal&319136
Member
Joined Nov 29 2011
Actions
Send a Message (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/auth/login?next=apps%2Fprofile%2FprofilePage%3Fid%3D844 70551)
Add as Friend (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/auth/login?next=apps%2Fprofile%2FprofilePage%3Fid%3D844 70551)
Flag as Inappropriate (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84470551/#)
General Info


MALE
Canada
Site Memberships


REALTRUTH.ORG (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)

Recent Activity


http://staticthumbs.freewebs.com/Apps/305/icon.pngMaurice Bernier (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84470551/) is now a member 13 hours ago


About Me
My name is Maurice Bernier and I have been a victim of slanderous accusations by the scam forum who once listed me as being the same person as someone else I'm associated with. According to them, I have cronies who do my bidding which I assume is anyone that associates with me.

The bottom line is that I run a real legitamate opportunity which pays on a regular basis and I have never and never will scam anybody. Quite the opposite oin fact. In almost every public article or blog I write, I suggest that my readers prtect themselves from scams.

I'm totally fed up with the crap that nothing more than busy bodies put out online and if this platform will eliminate these freaks and false accusations, I'm in big time!

Maurice Bernier
Owner/Founder: ThePowerOfOneIncome4Life (http://www.ibourl.com/cib)
Power Of One Free Marketing Tips Blog (http://tpooi4lworkfromhome.blogspot.com/)
Post a Comment

You must be a member to comment on this page. Sign In (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/login?try=1&next=) or Register (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/signup)
1 Comment

http://thumbs.webs.com/s/viewProfilePic/?siteId=84278624&memberId=53033406&size=square&33668 (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/53033406/)
Reply (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/auth/login)Katrina Oakley (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/53033406/)06:08 PM on November 29, 2011

I am proud to be one of your so called cronies! You are an honest marketer and you always tell it like it is!










http://images.freewebs.com/Images/Silk/page_white_text.pngREALSCAM.COM may live up to it's name? (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/show/10527500-realscam-com-may-live-up-to-it-s-name-)
by littleroundsoapboxmom (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/apps/profile/84278582/) | 4 comments



Copyright ©2011Create a Free Website at Webs.com (http://www.webs.com/)
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

(http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=120&winname=addthis&pub=webs&source=men-120&lng=en&s=&url=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fpr ofile%2F84470551%2F&title=Maurice%20Bernier%20-%20REALTRUTH.ORG&logo=&logobg=&logocolor=&ate=AT-webs/-/-/4ed5a027e289cc9f/1&frommenu=1&uid=4ed5a0275ee7d531&pre=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fme mbers%2F&tt=0)
(http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=120&winname=addthis&pub=webs&source=men-120&lng=en&s=&url=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fpr ofile%2F84470551%2F&title=Maurice%20Bernier%20-%20REALTRUTH.ORG&logo=&logobg=&logocolor=&ate=AT-webs/-/-/4ed5a027e289cc9f/1&frommenu=1&uid=4ed5a0275ee7d531&pre=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fme mbers%2F&tt=0)


Nos. of SponsoredMembers
1
10
100
500
1,000




3 Month
Renewal Plan




$20.00
$200.00
$2,000.00
$10,000.00
$20,000.00


BonusWealth Formula
Instant Income




$1.00



$10.00
$100.00
$500.00
$1,000.00


Bonus Wealth Formula
Referal Bonus




$4.90



$49.00
$490.00
$2,450.00
$4,900.00






By Adding Up Your Earnings This Is What You Could Earn In Your First 4 Months Without The $9,400.00 + Earnings You Could Get For Each Bonus Wealth Formula Position Created As You Add New Sponsored Members Into Your "TPOOI4L" Business.
Also Keep In Mind That These Are Residual Earnings!




Nos. of Sponsored




Members




1




10




100




500




1,000




3 Month
Renewal Plan




$25.90
$259.00
$2,590.00
$12,950.00
$25,900.00






Here's What You Could Earn Without Your Multiple $9,000+ Bonuses Created By Your "Bonus Wealth Formula" Positions During Your First Year Using The Same Data & 3 Four Month Periods!




Nos. of Sponsored




Members




1




10




100




500




1,000




3 Month
Renewal Plan




$77.70
$777.00
$7,770.00
$38,850.00
$77,700.00







Not a recruiting scheme, right Bernier??? Bernier's name is on that egregious letter. He will be getting plenty of publicity! The hideous threats against consumer advocates and legitimate websites have a nasty habit of backfiring. Tim Darnell and Jack Weinzierl are especially enjoying their names on the Harvard Law site. (http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/darnell-v-dobrott)

Soapboxmom

(http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=120&winname=addthis&pub=webs&source=men-120&lng=en&s=&url=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fpr ofile%2F84470551%2F&title=Maurice%20Bernier%20-%20REALTRUTH.ORG&logo=&logobg=&logocolor=&ate=AT-webs/-/-/4ed5a027e289cc9f/1&frommenu=1&uid=4ed5a0275ee7d531&pre=http%3A%2F%2Frealtruthorg.webs.com%2Fapps%2Fme mbers%2F&tt=0)

littleroundman
11-29-2011, 11:33 PM
How does Bogdan Fiedur sleep at night???

Hmmnn,

nature or nurture, perhaps ???


Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is described by the American Psychiatric Association (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Psychiatric_Association)'s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual), fourth edition (DSM-IV-TR), as an Axis II (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_II_%28psychology%29) personality disorder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder) characterized by "...a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood."[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_Personality_Disorder#cite_note-DSM-IV-TR-0)


Psychopathy (/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English)s (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)aɪ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)ˈ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)k (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)ɒ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)p (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)ə (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)θ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)i (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key)/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English)[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-0)[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-1)) is a mental disorder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_disorder) characterized primarily by a lack of empathy and remorse, shallow emotions, egocentricity, and deceptiveness. Psychopaths are highly prone to antisocial behavior and abusive treatment of others, and are very disproportionately responsible for violent crime. Though lacking empathy and emotional depth, they often manage to pass themselves off as average individuals by feigning emotions and lying about their past.


Until the 1980s, the term formally referred to a personality disorder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder) characterized by the inability to form human attachment[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-jhelfgott.pageout.net-2) and an abnormal lack of empathy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy), masked by an ability to appear outwardly normal. The publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disord ers) third edition (DSM-III) changed the name of this mental disorder to antisocial personality disorder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder), and also broadened the diagnostic criteria considerably by shifting from clinical inferences to behavioral diagnostic criteria.[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-3) However, the DSM-V (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSM-V) working party is recommending a revision of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) to include "Antisocial/Psychopathic Type", with the diagnostic criteria having a greater emphasis on character than on behavior.[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-autogenerated1-4) The ICD-10 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICD-10) diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Organization) also lacks psychopathy as a personality disorder. The 1992 manual included dissocial (antisocial) personality disorder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder), which encompasses amoral (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_nihilism), antisocial, asocial, psychopathic, and sociopathic personalities.[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-5)
Despite being currently unused in diagnostic manuals, psychopathy and related terms such as psychopath are still widely used by mental health professionals and laymen alike. In particular, NATO (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO) has funded a series of Advanced Study Institutes on psychopathy, both before and after the publication of DSM-III. Researcher Robert Hare (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hare_%28psychologist%29) has been a particular champion of the term; his Hare Psychopathy Checklist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_Psychopathy_Checklist) is the standard tool for differentiating between those with antisocial personality disorder and the subset who are psychopaths. According to this scale the prevalence of antisocial personality disorder is two to three times that of psychopathy.[7] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-6)
According to a chapter about treatment in Christopher J. Patrick's Handbook of Psychopathy, there is little evidence of a cure or any effective treatment for psychopathy; no medications can instill empathy, and psychopaths who undergo traditional talk therapy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk_therapy) might become more adept at manipulating others and more likely to commit crime.[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-Patrick_2006_555.E2.80.93572-7) Others suggest that psychopaths may benefit as much as others from therapy, at least in terms of effect on behavior even if not on the central personality traits.[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-sciam-8) According to Hare (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hare_%28psychologist%29), the consensus among researchers in this area is that psychopathy stems from a specific neurological disorder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurological_disorder) which is present from birth,[10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-withoutconscience-9) although a 2008 review indicated multiple causes and variation between individuals.[11] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-review2008-10) Hare estimates that about one percent of the US population are psychopaths.[12] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-neumann1-11)
Despite the similarity of the names, psychopaths are rarely psychotic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychotic).[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#cite_note-sciam-8)

scratchycat
11-30-2011, 09:45 AM
Well, well, well... A true fanclub for RealScam!!! 5 members already!!! OMG!!:shocked:

Thank you SBM for bringing this to our attention. Why is it that these things seem to originate in Canada?? It just seems to me these people admire us so much they want to help us out with more advertising. I believe though there must be a special place for folks who use religion and churches (?) to victimize others. I am too busy to join right now but when I saw that pfogel, that was enough for me. I will not go near any place that person is if I can avoid it. If you have not had the pleasure :pou: of dealing with him before, well you know...

path2prosperity
11-30-2011, 04:26 PM
I find this thread hilarious. It is the first time that I have ever seen it. the person who is noticeable by his absence is "Sir Roger" Let us hope for Sir Roger's sake that he has not joined you because he has a job or he is in the self employed JOB league "Just Over Broke." like most of "We British."

Don't dole out too much "dosh" to British citizens make any millionaires unless they register for VAT Maurice, HMCustoms and Excise may have something to say about that.

You threatened to sue me about a year ago. I have not received a letter from your lawyer yet! Perhaps it did arrive and I accidentally smoked it.

Soapboxmom
11-30-2011, 04:57 PM
Jake Simmons12:01 PM on November 30, 2011

I enjoyed this article. I am currently a UCLA law student doing research in advertising media ethics and came across this post and went to the related site. If an advertiser makes a claims that regarding their product, the proof of the claim falls on the advertiser, it has never been the legal responsibility of the medium publisher to verify or ensure the legitimacy of it. It does not matter if it's by print, the internet, television or radio. The medium is placing the content and placing it within their publication are under no moral or legal respsibility to verify the claim. What the Real Scam is engaging in is libel and defamation and could be a candidiate for a lawsuit. The easiest way to do this is to put together the people they slander with out proof and pool together the costs of suing these very deranged individuals. This of course would apply to all that made the posts up to and including the website owner if in fact the owner of this site is actively engaging in or has approved these posts.

I don't believe for one second this clown is a law student.

The Harvard Law site states:

...if you have web forums, allow reader comments, host guest bloggers on your site, or if you repost information that you receive from RSS feeds, section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/immunity-online-publishers-under-communications-decency-act) (“CDA 230”) will likely shield you from liability for certain kinds of problematic statements made by your users, guests and other third-parties on your site. This important federal law protects you from tort liability for statements contained in these materials – and any other user-submitted content – you publish on your site. You will not lose this immunity even if you moderate or edit this content, whether for accuracy or civility, so long as your edits do not substantially alter the meaning of the original statements. Keep in mind that CDA 230 will only protect you if a third-party – not you or your employee or someone acting under your direction – posts something on your blog or website. It does not shield you from liability for your own statements.
The anonymous website owner does not post or approve any statements and is not liable for what third parties post. The individuals making the statements are responsible, but you Mr. Law Student Extraordinaire have yet to quote and refute a single false statement of fact. Hyperbole and opinion are not generally actionable. So, clowny let's have those statements cited. How about the case law and statutes that you are basing your argument on outlined for us as well. While you are at it you might want to ask one of your professors (or in your case perhaps the nearest bartender) to fill you in on jurisdiction. You do know the posters on this site are for the most part anonymous and live all over the world, don't you????

Soapboxmom

laidback
11-30-2011, 05:04 PM
Registrant Organization:The Restored Church of God

Good Grief, it makes you wonder what was so wrong with the Church of God that it had to be restored! Didn't they like the parts that told you to do as you would be done by? Or was it the "thou shalt not covet thy neighbours goods" that they objected to, or "thou shalt not steal"? Never mind, now it has been restored and greed and theft by fraud is fine and those nasty people at Real Scam who object to this restoration are ..... well ... they are just being beastly and I am going to tell my mom!
There is some interesting reading about The reformed Church of God, as well as David Pack, its President/Pastor/Apostle/whatever. Here are a couple of more interesting articles, but if you do a Google you'll find bunches more: David C. Pack Declares Himself an Apostle (http://www.exitsupportnetwork.com/artcls/pack.htm)
Restored Church of God says blogging is wrong (excluding their own blog, natch) - Boing Boing (http://www.boingboing.net/2006/10/13/restored-church-of-g.html)

Soapboxmom
11-30-2011, 06:27 PM
Bogdan or his supporters site there literally stole the name. The logo says:
REALTRUTH.ORG (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)





But the actual url is:
http://realtruthorg.webs.com (http://realtruthorg.webs.com/)

Me thinks that may get that site in some doo-doo for pirating that name.

Webs - Make a free website, get free hosting (http://www.webs.com/?referer=wftr-blog-realtruthorg.webs.com&cm_mmc=Freewebs-_-Free%20Website-_-Freebar-_-blog)
Terms of Service - Webs.com (http://www.webs.com/terms.htm#content_activity)

It probably violates their TOS as well, especially with Bernier pushing his F5 Millionaire crap, but why would I complain about free advertising for our site??? Those clowns can't even afford to pay the hosting fees to set up a site???


Soapboxmom

Lil Ol' Radical Me
11-30-2011, 06:44 PM
Problem is , as I see SMB has just posted, the domain name realtruth.org belongs to The Restored Church of God in Ohio but Boggie's blog is realtruthorg/webs.com. He seems to have "borrowed" their domain for use as his header for the blog.

Whatever their merits or demerits, I wonder how the "Restored" will feel about their domain name being used by a blog owned by a ponzi apologist? What were those warnings you posted, Boggie, about breaking laws?


And as for our "law student from UCLA" - Jake, honey, you don't get to write slander, it's spoken, or haven't you gotten to that part of the course yet? If he is interested in advertising media ethics, there is a wealth of case law on deceptive advertising practices that he should bone up on. lol

scratchycat
11-30-2011, 08:44 PM
LORM, I agree. This is just so mind-boggling for me.:shocked: Confused is more the term. Why not just drop the whole thing???

Okay, whatever, I am out of here for the night. God bless us all and may I say, no I won't....

littleroundman
11-30-2011, 08:52 PM
Confused is more the term. Why not just drop the whole thing???

That's the thing, he can't "just drop it"

He still has a number of members who think Adland is legit.

They fully expect him to defend his and their honour, as the owner of a legit forum would be expected and entitled to do.

Which leaves him in a bind.

Does he hold his hands up and surrender, in which case he loses what genuine members he has left, or, does he cough up, confess and go into full Talkgold mode ?

Rock and hardplace.

laidback
12-01-2011, 03:35 PM
That's the thing, he can't "just drop it"

He still has a number of members who think Adland is legit.

They fully expect him to defend his and their honour, as the owner of a legit forum would be expected and entitled to do.

Which leaves him in a bind.

Does he hold his hands up and surrender, in which case he loses what genuine members he has left, or, does he cough up, confess and go into full Talkgold mode ?

Rock and hardplace.
BINGO!!! He has identified a corner and has suitably backed himself into it as is evident by his statement,
I was waiting a year to start talking about it but this had to be done and now there is no return. It is probably pretty well summed up by this little poem:

Be careful of the words you say.
Keep them soft and sweet,
Because you never know, from day to day,
Which ones you'll have to eat.
-- K. McCarthy

Soapboxmom
12-01-2011, 05:12 PM
We have one more (#6) fan club member! Jim Allen, III. Isn't he a peach? They have yet to update the site or substantiate a single accusation made. Bogdan obviously isn't getting much of this:

:butt_kisser:

Soapboxmom

laidback
12-01-2011, 05:30 PM
I see Wallace put up a post at the "realtruth" site. Wonder how long it'll last:

Wallace
05:04 PM on December 01, 2011

Jake Simmons says...
I enjoyed this article. I am currently a UCLA law student doing research in advertising media ethics and came across this post and went to the related site. If an advertiser makes a claims that regarding their product, the proof of the claim falls on the advertiser, it has never been the legal responsibility of the medium publisher to verify or ensure the legitimacy of it. It does not matter if it's by print, the internet, television or radio. The medium is placing the content and placing it within their publication are under no moral or legal respsibility to verify the claim. What the Real Scam is engaging in is libel and defamation and could be a candidiate for a lawsuit. The easiest way to do this is to put together the people they slander with out proof and pool together the costs of suing these very deranged individuals. This of course would apply to all that made the posts up to and including the website owner if in fact the owner of this site is actively engaging in or has approved these posts.


An interesting argument, but flawed. You are viewing Realscam as an entity, or organization, which it is not. It is a forum, where people can voice their opinions and observations. As has been stated many times, the owner is anonymous and does not actively participate. The opinions are those of the individual posters only. Your assertion that Realscam is engaging in anything is ludicrous.
This Jake Simmons law student should probably hope his professors don't read his drivel.

path2prosperity
12-01-2011, 07:12 PM
We have one more (#6) fan club member! Jim Allen, III. Isn't he a peach? They have yet to update the site or substantiate a single accusation made. Bogdan obviously isn't getting much of this:

:butt_kisser:

Soapboxmom

He could have developed a terminal illness like Felicia.

Dave Cotterill developed one that was not cancer. I even wondered if it was true because his mates were not asking for money.

Wouldn't it be nice to find an Ex Adlander to help RS and EA. Does anybody remember Heidrun Peters? I believed her story and I invited her to come and stay with me. I had a stroke and I lost contact but I heard from her again then I lost touch again. Heidrun was fluent in Russian and so many other languages that she would be able to read Adlandpro in Polish.

She would be a tremendous asset, if we could locate her. She was very friendly with an Adlander who was known as Norman Smith whom I thought was bona fide but he has another Adland name now. WHY DID NORMAN SMITH change his name?

Lil Ol' Radical Me
12-02-2011, 04:36 AM
Not a recruiting scheme, right Bernier??? Bernier's name is on that egregious letter. He will be getting plenty of publicity! The hideous threats against consumer advocates and legitimate websites have a nasty habit of backfiring. Tim Darnell and Jack Weinzierl are especially enjoying their names on the Harvard Law site.


"The court initially granted Darnell a temporary restraining order, but in a June 23, 2008 hearing it dissolved the restraining order and denied Darnell's request for a temporary injunction, stating that "prior restraints on speech are presumptively unconstitutional and I have not heard anything that would indicate . . . why the relief requested would take it out of that presumption".

Don't you just love it! I join LRM in a heartfelt wish that the Bogmeister SUES.

Soapboxmom
12-02-2011, 10:38 AM
Getting a TRO / temporary is a very expensive piece of cake here in the U.S. The complaining party will be the only one at the emergency restraining order hearing, but another hearing which includes the one under the order must be noticed and scheduled within days. That hearing with Tim Darnell was hilarious. After the long diatribe about how he had received many threats and was being stalked by me, he admitted in front of the judge that he had never seen me before and had had no idea what I looked like. He never produced a shred of evidence because he couldn't. Tim Darnell instantly destroyed his credibility.

Bogdan would do the same. When any judge actually gets wind about what Bogdan's critics have been writing he will get laughed out of the courtroom and possibly sanctioned. Of course, he will get some really classy legal help by begging for attorneys on his slam site!!!

Soapboxmom

Soapboxmom
12-02-2011, 12:32 PM
Jake Simmons11:29 AM on December 02, 2011


Wallace says...

An interesting argument, but flawed. You are viewing Realscam as an entity, or organization, which it is not. It is a forum, where people can voice their opinions and observations. As has been stated many times, the owner is anonymous and does not actively participate. The opinions are those of the individual posters only. Your assertion that Realscam is engaging in anything is ludicrous.

In a word I would be more than happy to debate this issue with you, you see you must know the laws of the land not state what you interpret them to be. Any disparaging statement made by one person about another, which is communicated or published and if the claim made is false and published is communicated to someone other than the person defamed falls under defamation by principle and law. In common law jurisdictions and United States law, slander refers to a malicious, false and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism. The law and act states the burden of proof falls on the individual making the claims and the burden of proof is very high. You do have the freedom of speech in most of these jurisdictions; however the laws in most jurisdictions supersede the freedom of speech when it comes to unwarranted harmful or hateful statements. The fact that you state that the owner of Real Scam is not involved tells me you have some type of contact with them to know this and if in fact he/she is not involved would mean that they are just the broadcasting medium and therefore fall under the broadcasters code if they have a legal statement on their site that they do not endorse or support the statements made by members. The FCC which covers the legislation of broadcasters and is careful to not become involved with the broadcasters First Amendment Rights unless they broadcast hate, defamation, slander or libel. There is such a Legal link on the Adlandpro site stating the responsibilities of the members or customers postings but it appears you have chosen to ignore that and make implications which my friend is in fact criminal. Personally I have asked others in my class to look into this as part of our test studies. You and your friends may believe what you are doing is noble and for that you will be protected; however breaking laws under the guise of righteousness is not noble it just in fact criminal. You and your friends are going down a dangerous road, my free advice would be I am sure you believe in your cause and that's fine but use some discretion and be more careful in what you state and about who, otherwise you will find that the one's you are chasing will be well inside their legal rights to be chasing you and if you have no documentation or physical proof to back yourselves up you will lose.

If the claim made is false --- bingo. That is a false statement of fact. Opinion and hyperbole are not generally actionable. And libel and defamation are almost always a tort (civil). It would, in most jurisdictions, cross into criminal only in a case where there is a threat of harm (likely physical harm) You, Jake, have yet to cite these alleged falsities and refute them with any verifiable facts. You are just blowing smoke, lad. And, again U.S. federal law seems to be escaping you.

The Harvard Law site states:

...if you have web forums, allow reader comments, host guest bloggers on your site, or if you repost information that you receive from RSS feeds, section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/immunity-online-publishers-under-communications-decency-act) (“CDA 230”) will likely shield you from liability for certain kinds of problematic statements made by your users, guests and other third-parties on your site. This important federal law protects you from tort liability for statements contained in these materials – and any other user-submitted content – you publish on your site. You will not lose this immunity even if you moderate or edit this content, whether for accuracy or civility, so long as your edits do not substantially alter the meaning of the original statements. Keep in mind that CDA 230 will only protect you if a third-party – not you or your employee or someone acting under your direction – posts something on your blog or website. It does not shield you from liability for your own statements.




You, Jake, better be able to substantiate your claims that folks from RS are doing something criminal. And, let's be honest. I could get better advice from the nearest bartender!

Soapboxmom

littleroundman
12-02-2011, 12:46 PM
which is communicated or published and if the claim made is false and published

Are illegal programs advertised on Adland ?

Does Fiedur accept money for the advertising ??

Has Fiedur been advised said programs are illegal ??

Has Fiedur taken steps to ensure the programs he advertises are NOT illegal ??

Has Fiedur consulted an attorney and/or the relevant authorities with regard to whether or not what he is doing is legal ???

Does the phrase "knew or ought to have known" apply to Fiedur ??

Soapboxmom
12-02-2011, 01:08 PM
Jake Simmons12:01 PM on November 30, 2011

I enjoyed this article. I am currently a UCLA law student doing research in advertising media ethics and came across this post and went to the related site. If an advertiser makes a claims that regarding their product, the proof of the claim falls on the advertiser, it has never been the legal responsibility of the medium publisher to verify or ensure the legitimacy of it. It does not matter if it's by print, the internet, television or radio. The medium is placing the content and placing it within their publication are under no moral or legal respsibility to verify the claim.



Broadcast Advertising Complaints | FCC.gov (http://www.fcc.gov/guides/broadcast-advertising-complaints)

Broadcast Advertising Complaints

Background

Consumers often complain to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) about broadcast advertising: they complain about the nature of the products being advertised, the timing of certain ads (for example, during mealtime) or commercials that they believe are indecent or in poor taste. Other consumers complain about ads that they feel are poorly produced or grammatically incorrect. The FCC also receives complaints regarding false and misleading advertisements.
Are There Any Laws That Limit the Material That Stations Can Broadcast?

There are laws passed by Congress that restrict a station from broadcasting material that promotes certain lotteries, advertises cigarettes, little cigars or smokeless tobacco products, or perpetuates a fraud. Additionally, there are federal laws that prohibit or limit obscene, indecent or profane language. Also, some advertisements may violate laws that have been established by other government agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Obscene broadcasts are prohibited at all times, while indecent or profane broadcasts are prohibited during certain hours. Violators are subject to sanctions that include civil penalties, criminal fines, license revocation and/or imprisonment of not more than two years. For more information about the FCC’s authority regarding obscene, indecent, or profane broadcasts, visit the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau website (http://www.fcc.gov/eb/oip) or see our consumer guide (http://www.realscam.com/guides/obscenity-indecency-and-profanity).




Advertising law (http://www.radford.edu/wkovarik/class/law/1.10advert.html)

3. General advertising regulation
The most important regulator for general commercial advertising is the Federal Trade Commission (http://www.ftc.gov/), and its guidelines are extensive, but generally fall into the category of avoiding deception and backing up advertising claims.
Major areas include:


Truth in Advertising (http://www.sba.gov/content/truth-advertising)-- Advertising laws are aimed at protecting consumers by requiring advertisers to be truthful about their products and to be able to substantiate their claims. All businesses must comply with advertising and marketing laws (From SBA web site)
Product labeling (http://www.sba.gov/content/product-labeling) -- Claims made on product packaging must comply with some basic truth-in-packaging and labeling rules. These claims include descriptions of ingredients, package size and volume, and discount or lower price labeling. Under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issue regulations requiring all consumer commodities be labeled to disclose net contents, identity of the product, and the name and place of business of the product's manufacturer, packer or distributor. (From SBA web site)
Special product advertising (http://www.sba.gov/content/advertising-specific-products) -- Automobiles, computers and internet services, health and fitness products, housing and real estate, telephone services, and environmental or green marketing claims (http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/grnrule/guides980427.htm) . For alcohol and children's advertising, see below.

The FTC issues guidelines (http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/guides/guides.htm)which help advertisers understand regulations in areas such as price claims, use of the word "free," endorsements, diet plans, food advertising and so on. For example, the FTC says:







6. Advertising ethics
Most publications and broadcast organizations have codes, standards or guidelines for deciding what will and will not be accepted. The publisher or broadcaster has the responsibility for libel, invasion of privacy or other faults in an advertisement








Just what standards does Bogdan have, much less enforce. Let me guess anything that lines his pockets $$$$$ goes!!!

Soapboxmom

path2prosperity
12-02-2011, 01:22 PM
Are illegal programs advertised on Adland ?


Was that a typo LRM? Did you mean are there any legal programs advertised on Adlandpro. How many legal programs can you spot per 100 ads? If it is bad now, how much worse was it beore Scratcy was invited to mod and remove nudes? I am too scared of Boggie bugs to test it myself.

Adlandpro Traffic Exchange (http://www.1st-treasures.com/site/te.html).

scratchycat
12-02-2011, 01:32 PM
Class:
Junior

Hometown:
Hemet, CA

High School:
Hemet

Height / Weight:
6-1 / 180

Position:
Playmaker

Birthdate:
05/31/1981









1999 — Redshirted.

High School — Three-year water polo letterwinner for coach Bryan Linton, two years as a goalkeeper and one year as a utility player … Three-time first-team all-league honoree … As a senior, was a second team All-CIF selection and league MVP … Helped squad to three league championships … Two-time team captain … Played for Inland All-Star and Southern California Men’s Youth teams … Lettered four years in swimming … All-Riverside County selection and two-time all-league swimmer …CIF consolation finalist in the 50, 100 freestyle and 100 backstroke … Helped team to league championship, while a two-year team captain.

Personal — Full name: John Jacob Simmons … Born May 31, 1981, in Hemet, Calif. … Enjoys listening to music and playing basketball … Sister Coralie Simmons currently plays for UCLA and Guy Baker’s U.S. National Team participating in the 2000 Olympics in Sydney… Greatest athletic thrill thus far was playing in 10-9 quadruple overtime win in the first round of CIF playoffs as a senior … Undecided major.

Source:

Player Bio: Jake Simmons - UCLA Official Athletic Site (http://www.uclabruins.com/sports/m-wpolo/mtt/simmons_jake00.html)

Soapboxmom
12-02-2011, 02:36 PM
No one with that name is listed in the UCLA directory. I called the UCLA legal department to confirm if he is in fact a student there. No student can opt out of the directory. He is not listed there under any version of his name. Bogdan has associated himself with another scammer extraordinaire! There is not any Jake / John Jacob Simmons or anything faintly resembling that enrolled there. If this guy was for real he would be proud to be making a name for himself and would be quoting statutes and case law with ease. He is just another one of Bogdan's buffoons.

Soapboxmom

Soapboxmom
12-11-2011, 06:50 PM
As our dear departed Paul Harvey would say, "the rest of the story." So, we have Bogdan Fiedur the threatening, lying goon, provably fake UCLA law students cheering him on, Maurice Bernier pulling his strings and a few other scam promoters singing his praises while every civilized person abandons ship post haste! The rest of the story is quite a sordid saga!

http://www.realscam.com/f16/julian-wieder-howard-kennedy-lawyer-bogdan-fiedur-owner-scam-ponzi-promoting-site-adlandpro-955/index7.html
(http://www.realscam.com/f16/julian-wieder-howard-kennedy-lawyer-bogdan-fiedur-owner-scam-ponzi-promoting-site-adlandpro-955/index7.html)

consolidation
01-08-2012, 07:46 AM
What sort of person would have the audacity to claim they need to "restore" the Church, I am personally a man with faith, but bogus clowns like this, who use a persons faith to deceive are deplorable....shame on you The Restored fake Church of God? in Ohio.

http://www.exitsupportnetwork.com/letters/ltrs10.htm

scratchycat
01-08-2012, 10:09 AM
Research and Exposé on
on Worldwide Church of God
(Grace Communion International)


Deception works because it appears as something it is not. ~ Gregory Reid



These articles, letters, and transcriptions cover a time span from about 1960 to 2009 and show a progression of events within the organization in regard to deceit, mind manipulation, exploitation, doctrinal distractions and history revision. (This excludes history charts.)

consolidation, this is some good research done on this church. Interesting post, thanks.
Research and Exposé on Worldwide Church of God (http://www.exitsupportnetwork.com/resrch/wcg/index.htm)

scratchycat
01-08-2012, 10:11 AM
Join Site


All Members (7)

Sort by Display NameLast LoginCreation DateMember PermissionsRandom


Jim Allen, III
Member
Male - 54

Katrina Oakley
Member
Female
Indiana
Maurice Bernier
Member
Male
Canada
Ojeezus
Member
Male
USA-World
blt20x
Member
Male
Akron

littleroundsoapboxmom
Site Owner
Winnipeg, Canada
pfogel
Member
Male
Israel

http://www.realscam.com/f13/realscam-its-admins-have-fan-club-we-do-conspire-expose-scammers-949/index2.html

Looks like the boat must have sunk in their own lies.

EagleOne
01-09-2012, 03:08 AM
WOW, Groupies already! After spouting all this legaleze mumbo-jumbo, they are going to sue, right? Maybe these wannabe lawyers should take a course in Discovery. A lovely word, and it is the one word that makes all these scam operators and promoters run for cover. But Libel and Slander? Please tell me it is true they are going to sue, and not just talk about it.

They are about as pathetic as Festa and Buster since they don't let facts get in the way of their rants. :RpS_lol::RpS_lol:

path2prosperity
01-09-2012, 09:00 AM
This saga is a new version of Bob Krimm and his mod squad. Krimm threatened to sue me. I ignored the threats and wrote more "libel (http://path2prosperity.com/krimm_videos.html)" about him.

Krimm's mods or cronies ganged up and called themselves "Mod Squad." The five or six in the motley crew squad tried to get into the news and win the sympathy vote by taking over NetSurfMonitor. They said the owner had given them permission to tell their story about the injury to Krimm which was being caused by one old woman in UK.

The owner of NetSurfMonitor Gary something or other flunked out and sold his monitor to David Estes. David would not publish malicious gossip about anybody without evidence, so that fell flat. Krimm's mod squad could not get any support from online journalists so they united and threatned to sue me as a group.

Where are the Krimm mods now? Wiseowl's picture is being circulated on every underground network. I am pretty sure that Jerry (only talk facts) has shown his nose in here. These fake law students and church members who originated from Adlandpro could easily be ex Krimm members. They are completely effete and doomed to failure like Krimm's Mod Squad. The Tonik ( a Krimm mod) opened a forex training school around the same time as Jill Bachman opened hers. She gave that up pretty quickly so where is The Tonik?

path2prosperity
01-10-2012, 07:22 AM
So, we have Bogdan Fiedur the threatening, lying goon, provably fake UCLA law students cheering him on, Maurice Bernier pulling his strings and a few other scam promoters singing his praises while every civilized person abandons ship post haste! The rest of the story is quite a sordid saga!

http://www.realscam.com/f16/julian-wieder-howard-kennedy-lawyer-bogdan-fiedur-owner-scam-ponzi-promoting-site-adlandpro-955/index7.html
(http://www.realscam.com/f16/julian-wieder-howard-kennedy-lawyer-bogdan-fiedur-owner-scam-ponzi-promoting-site-adlandpro-955/index7.html)

Bernier and Bachman are obviously pulling the strings. People who sing Bogdan's praises have probably got money tied up in the idiot Bernier's "Quack Millionaire's Club." or his Khan Academy which awards degrees to poor suckers from third world countries. Bachman also pulls his strings with her LGNProsperity deal. LGN has been featured in Bachman's signature files since she stopped making money from ASD. Fiedur bellyached about her "Mountain of Crap." when he had control of Adland.

scratchycat
01-10-2012, 12:02 PM
516


Bernier and Bachman are obviously pulling the strings. People who sing Bogdan's praises have probably got money tied up in the idiot Bernier's "Quack Millionaire's Club." or his Khan Academy which awards degrees to poor suckers from third world countries. Bachman also pulls his strings with her LGNProsperity deal. LGN has been featured in Bachman's signature files since she stopped making money from ASD. Fiedur bellyached about her "Mountain of Crap." when he had control of Adland.

My change of color and size and yes, you are so right on!!

I realize few care who is in control of the cesspool but maybe we should be. I am attaching an adobe file to this message, look at it closely and compare the archive with the new findings.

Also, never has Bogdan had anything in his About Me all the years I was active in Adlandpro. Now this appears in signature.

Bogdan Fiedur and Adlandpro (http://www.bogdanfiedur.com)
Bogdan Fiedur and Adlandpro (http://www.bogdanfiedur.info)
Bogdan Fiedur and Adlandpro (http://www.bogdanfiedur.biz)
Bogdan Fiedur and Adlandpro (http://www.bogdanfiedur.net)

That is the testament left to keep the Figurehead up front at present. That is if we did not damage that profile too bad here in RS.

scratchycat
01-10-2012, 12:06 PM
Still in doubt, check out who is posting in the Bogdan (figurehead) forum:


135-The global revolution has started - It will enable resource based economy | View Thread | AdlandPro Community (http://community.adlandpro.com/forums/post/2438721/TheglobalrevolutionhasstartedItwillenableresourceb asedeconomy/135.aspx)

Does not take a genius to see who has taken over.:duh:

path2prosperity
01-10-2012, 04:47 PM
Still in doubt, check out who is posting in the Bogdan (figurehead) forum:


135-The global revolution has started - It will enable resource based economy | View Thread | AdlandPro Community (http://community.adlandpro.com/forums/post/2438721/TheglobalrevolutionhasstartedItwillenableresourceb asedeconomy/135.aspx)

Does not take a genius to see who has taken over.:duh:

Bachman + Bernier = BoggyBoy. or Bachman + Bogdan + Bernier = BoggyBoy.


Well done RS members who have helped to expose BoggyBoy as a complete farce, a ridiculous partnership or an unholy trinity.

Whip
01-10-2012, 09:04 PM
Still in doubt, check out who is posting in the Bogdan (figurehead) forum:


135-The global revolution has started - It will enable resource based economy | View Thread | AdlandPro Community (http://community.adlandpro.com/forums/post/2438721/TheglobalrevolutionhasstartedItwillenableresourceb asedeconomy/135.aspx)

Does not take a genius to see who has taken over.:duh:

Not for nothing but that site just looks so amateur and 8th grader designish.

scratchycat
01-11-2012, 10:23 AM
Whip, you might be surprised how many people think it is the greatest show on earth!! However, the members who are active are very few now and all the scammers have taken complete control.