Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

[JustTooMuchTime]

"Byron Nelson" - aka byronnelson796 made this bizarre statement about Stephen's posting of his default judgement against Alicia Lyttle & Monetized Marketing:
"You are an idiot. Stephen has the right and an obligation to clear his name just the same as anyone else."

Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle ... (http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce/stephen-pierce-awarded-36-million-judgment-against-alicia-lyttle-monetized-marketing)

[Soapboxmom]

I for one want to see the proof of service. It is also quite possible, had the defendant been properly served and answered, that this case would have been tossed for lack of jurisdiction. The defendant was said to be in Florida, so why is that clown suing her in Collin County Texas????

[Whip]

I for one want to see the proof of service. It is also quite possible, had the defendant been properly served and answered, that this case would have been tossed for lack of jurisdiction. The defendant was said to be in Florida, so why is that clown suing her in Collin County Texas????

To precisely get a default judgment, albeit a bogus one.

[Bran P]

I agree. Everyone has the right to clear their name. Problem is that this DEFAULT JUDGEMENT didn't clear Stephen Pierce (What Is Success Sculpting (http://www.successsculpting.com)) name or clear up anything else. Does you (byronnelson796) not know the meaning of DEFAULT? There was no testimony, no trial, no evidence presented, no depositions, no witnesses, no accountants reports (because Stephen Pierce won't spend the money to hire them). There was NOTHING done to clear his name or point blame to anyone else. Nada. Nothing. Just an overwrought divorcee who didn't get her paperwork in on time. Big deal, Byron.

Remember when you played soccer and the other team failed to show up for the game cause several of their players were sick or it was pouring down rain? You won by default and took off for the Pizza Hut. But did you crow to all your fiends that you "WON" that game? Of course not. You got too much sense to do that, Byron. YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT IS REAL AND WHAT AIN'T. Stephen Pierce don't have that much sense. He bragging over nuthin' and you're buying' it. Shame on you, son. Shame on you.

[littleroundman]

$3.5 million settlement in a default judgement against your ex wife, hey ???

Maybe it's an American thing, but I sure as h*** wouldn't be crowing about it in public.

Then again, I'm not a guru, I suppose.

[Soapboxmom]

Case History









Case Number
296-00485-2012


Date Filed:
02/07/2012


Case Type:
CV - All Other Civil Cases


Status:
Re-Opened


Style:
Stephen Pierce International, Inc,Impulsive Profits, Inc Vs. Alicia Lyttle,Loretta Lyttle,Ilona Lyttle,Monetized Marketing ,LLC


JudicialOfficer:
Roach, John R., Jr. in 296th District Court








Parties






Type
Name
DOB
Address
Attorney


Defendant
Lyttle, Alicia


Shawn M McCaskill


Defendant
Lyttle, Ilona

Pro Se


Defendant
Lyttle, Loretta


Pro Se


Defendant
Monetized Marketing ,LLC

Shawn M McCaskill


Plaintiff
Impulsive Profits, Inc


Paul B Kerlin


Plaintiff
Stephen Pierce International, Inc

Paul B Kerlin











Case Events




Date
Event Type
Comments
Cancelled Reason
Time
Judge


02/07/2012
Plaintiff's Original Petition (OCA) $258.00






02/07/2012
Request for Citation $8.00






02/07/2012
Jury Fee Paid $30.00






02/07/2012
Request for Citation to Secretary Of State $12.00






02/08/2012
Citation
thru Sec. of State





02/08/2012
Citation






03/09/2012
Correspondence
Copies of Affidavit of Service





03/12/2012
Original Answer






03/13/2012
Letter
with Sheriff returns





04/02/2012
Motion for Substituted Service
Plaintiff's Motion for Service on Alicia Lyttle Under Rule 106





04/03/2012
Affidavit
of service from Secretary of State. Forwarded on 02.10.12 by cert mail and returned on 3.15.12 "Unclaimed"





04/03/2012
Letter
with sheriff returns





04/04/2012
Correspondence
from court





04/05/2012
Order Granted
on motion for service under Rule 106





04/23/2012
Original Answer
in Response to the State of Texas Civil Citation





06/27/2012
Motion for Default Judgment






06/27/2012
Affidavit
of Paul B Kerlin





07/09/2012
Correspondence
from Theodore Watts





07/13/2012
Default Judgment






07/18/2012
Mailed
default judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing LLC





07/20/2012
Letter
with Amended DFJ





07/22/2012
Amended Judgment






07/23/2012
Mailed
def judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing





07/27/2012
Returned Mail Undeliverable






08/01/2012
Returned Mail Undeliverable
to Monetized Marketing LLC





08/03/2012
Request for Copies $1.00 / pg






08/06/2012
Original Answer






08/06/2012
Original Answer
Special Appearance, and Subject Thereto, Original Answer





08/13/2012
Motion - New Trial - Civil $40.00
Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial





08/17/2012
Correspondence






09/21/2012
Plaintiff's
Response to Defs Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial





09/26/2012
Hearing
Special Appearance, Motion to Vacate, Motion New Trial

9:00 AM



09/26/2012
General Docket Entry
Special Appearance/Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. Rulings made on the record. OTBFC.


Roach, John R., Jr.


09/26/2012
Order






01/28/2013
Notice of Nonsuit






02/05/2013
Order on Nonsuit






02/20/2013
Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA
Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial












So, we have an order to vacate Pierce's judgment and for a new trial. The case has been reopened. They have a rather odd fellow for the judge. This is the judge I was before who made some very bizarre rulings in the case of Rep X vs. Advantage Conferences.

This will be one to follow. I might even drop by and catch a hearing!

Soapboxmom

[Soapboxmom]

We shall see how long this second comment remains. Apparently, Pierce doesn't want his readers to have the facts:

Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle ... (http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce/stephen-pierce-awarded-36-million-judgment-against-alicia-lyttle-monetized-marketing)

http://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-KingPierce-48x48.jpg?1360356073 (http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce) + Follow (http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce/stephen-pierce-awarded-36-million-judgment-against-alicia-lyttle-monetized-marketing#)
Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle & Monetized Marketing

by Stephen Pierce (http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce) on Aug 02, 2012




16,929 views

Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle & Monetized Marketing. You can read this order for more details.







1–9 of 9 comments Post a comment (http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce/stephen-pierce-awarded-36-million-judgment-against-alicia-lyttle-monetized-marketing#postComment)
http://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-HeatherDobrott-48x48.jpg?1361717256 Heather Dobrott (http://www.slideshare.net/HeatherDobrott) 02/20/2013 Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial

Are you such a lying piece of dirt you don't want your readers to have the facts?

[wserra]

Are you such a lying piece of dirt you don't want your readers to have the facts?

Famous question from the Nuremberg trials, directed over and over by the chief Russian prosecutor to Hermann Göring on cross-examination: "Do you now admit that you are a Fascist beast?"

[Soapboxmom]

That silly little man keeps removing my comments. I am right back on his butt!

Post a comment (http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce/stephen-pierce-awarded-36-million-judgment-against-alicia-lyttle-monetized-marketing#postComment) http://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-HeatherDobrott-48x48.jpg?1361717256 Heather Dobrott (http://www.slideshare.net/HeatherDobrott) Where is Paul Harvey with the rest of the story when we need him???

07/22/2012 Amended Judgment
07/23/2012 Mailed def judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing
07/27/2012 Returned Mail Undeliverable
08/01/2012 Returned Mail Undeliverable to Monetized Marketing LLC
08/03/2012 Request for Copies $1.00 / pg
08/06/2012 Original Answer
08/06/2012 Original Answer Special Appearance, and Subject Thereto, Original Answer
08/13/2012 Motion - New Trial - Civil $40.00 Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
08/17/2012 Correspondence
09/21/2012 Plaintiff's Response to Defs Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
09/26/2012 Hearing Special Appearance, Motion to Vacate, Motion New Trial 9:00 AM
09/26/2012 General Docket Entry Special Appearance/Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. Rulings made on the record. OTBFC. Roach, John R., Jr.
09/26/2012 Order
01/28/2013 Notice of Nonsuit
02/05/2013 Order on Nonsuit
02/20/2013 Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial

[formeremployee]

Dear Soapbox and Whip, I am pleased as punch to inform you that the Secretary of State Office of the Comptroller has officially put Stephen Pierce International (SPI) out of business for unpaid taxes. See this link: https://ourcpa.cpa.state.tx.us/coa/servlet/cpa.app.coa.CoaGetTp?Pg=tpid&Search_Nm=stephen%20pierce%20international%20&Button=search&Search_ID=32033222616.

That means that SPI is no longer able to sue anyone. The court has closed all pending cases that have come before it and will close the case against Alicia and Lorette as well. See this link: Search (http://apps.collincountytx.gov/cccasesearch/Search.aspx).

Those who have been damaged can sue Stephen Pierce individually for their damages as he does have income from new online businesses and book sales. I think it costs $125 to sue him in Small Claims Court and you can get a judgement up to $10,000.